Share.

    10 commenti

    1. Fast_Gap7215 on

      For the military it is right how do you really stand with Ukraine while you have gazprom bank here . While in Clearstream you still work with Russian bonds . How do you stand with Ukraine while you allow the biggest ally of Russia , china to have 7 banks in lux .
      How to you stand with Ukraine while there are hundred of funds with Russian investors .

    2. Vihruska on

      And yet, it’s in the top5 of countries that own most American debt in the world. 😁

      That USSR comment somehow doesn’t shock me.

    3. Primary_Bad_3019 on

      Educational comment:

      Luxembourg is 4th biggest US debt holder.

      We hold 430 billion USD debt, I wonder how the Americans think their economy holds together. US is built on top of stability and perceived value to their dollar by investors. There is literally nothing backing US dollar like other currencies.

      So Luxembourg has the means to fuck up US royally. Say, to sell their debt to China or better yet donate it to Ukraine.

      Wouldn’t that be ironic 🙂

    4. Monsieurfrank on

      Luxembourg has supported NATO through resources rather than troops. For example, during the mission in Afghanistan, it contributed to the critical satellite communication link.

    5. TheRealMylo on

      Get out of twitter for your mental health… it’s full of bots that push one narrative

    6. Maxiboud on

      Yes comrade Gromperekichelcher, glory to the SSSL (Soviet Social Republic of Luxembourg)

    7. ubiquitousfoolery on

      Whenever I see political comments from some social media site, dead internet theory rings very true. It’s always the same sort of ridiculous stuff and the account names and avatars are always so silly.
      Why do I never see such posts in discusdions of videogames, nerdy memes and intellectual topics?
      I’d say it’s because that’s where the actual human beings are, not the bots and professional trolls.

      Read a disagreement between two users on a thread about carpentry and compare it to disagreements between two (let’s say) accounts on a political issue.
      It’s not just the radical tone change, it’s the overall language being used.
      It’s the immediate accusations, the crass name-calling and the lack of arguments based on content.

      I think such comments are not about users expressing their opinions. They are about readers reading confusing and contradictory statements that muddy the waters and drive more and more people towards either retreating from politics or retreating into an extreme camp where flexible adaptation of one’s political opinions is made very difficult.
      In short, it harms democratic thinking.

    8. “A former USSR member” Huh?
      I didn’t know that the USSR conquered western Europe.

      Russian bots …

    Leave A Reply