Le nazioni europee dovrebbero annullare i loro ordini F-35? Quale sarebbe un buon getto di sostituzione?

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/petersuciu/2025/03/06/calls-increase-on-social-media-for-europe-to-cancel-f-35-orders/

    di Pit_Bull_Admin

    Share.

    25 commenti

    1. ArtemisJolt on

      That’s the problem. There ~~no~~ only one good replacement jet. Eurofighter passed up development of a 5th gen fighter in favor of beginning development of a 6th gen fighter.

      As much as we might not like it, ~~Europe is stuck with the F-35~~ Europes only other option is the Korean KF-21

    2. Sad_Mall_3349 on

      I read today that Gripen variants have GE engines where US can block the sale to any country.
      And just now, I read that Saab denies that.

      So everything with US tech is ultimately an issue.

    3. insomnimax_99 on

      That’s the thing, there isn’t a replacement jet.

      The only other 5th gen jet is the F-22, which is also American (and is so good that the Americans won’t export it to anyone).

    4. doppelkoernchen on

      the reason germany bought the F35 is to be able to deliver american nukes.

      i don’t know about the rest but if germany can switch the american nukes out for either french or our own then the F35 wold become unnecessary…

    5. KingStar2000_ on

      Rafale, Typhoon and Grippen ?

      Bonus : Rafale is French nuke friendly

    6. Waibelingen on

      F-35 is a bust as long as there’s a kill switch in Texas.

    7. Karlssen80 on

      Not one model

      A mix of fighters depending on the task to be performed

      Gripen – Interceptor, Cheap, Flexible
      Rafale/Eurofighter – Range, Nukes, Bomber

    8. Independent-Bite6439 on

      Yes, get rid. Upgrade Eurofighter, buy Swedish, French.

    9. Lofi_Joe on

      We should develop new type of weapons and shielding.

      And we should work very hard on alternative sources of energy production, we even should consider looking on those crazy theories and test them all.

    10. dnemonicterrier on

      European defences need to be built up right now so I say take them so that we can defend against Russia.

    11. InnocentiusLacrimosa on

      Yes and Gripen or Mirage. Finally Eurofighter for next gen capabilities when it’s development finishes. US is not Europe’s ally.

    12. fiendishrabbit on

      F-35 fulfills a unique role for NATO. It’s a high altitude bomb-truck designed to make the NATO thing easier by allowing a multirole fighter to operate at high altitude much closer to high altitude air defenses like S-300/S-400.

      However:

      * US are proving that they’re willing to vote treasonous fascists into power. NATO needs a replacement that doesn’t give the US that much power over their allies.
      * F-35 has proven itself to be a maintenance hog with low availability and high costs per flight hours. Overall unsuited to being an air force workhorse as it can’t perform the volume of missions that an air force needs to do in peace and in war.

      The two current alternatives (until GCAP or FCAS produces something. If they produce something) would be Rafale or Gripen. These won’t be able to conduct a NATO style assault, but will be able to fend off a superior air power from operating over your own territory.

      Both are fully compatible with European missiles, offering a full suite of air-to-air and air-to-ground armaments, advanced electronics packages and the agility to operate at altitudes where they almost hug the ground if needed (for the type of guerilla warfare that Ukraine has been doing for the last 3 years).

      Of the two the Rafale has the advantage that it’s fully european, exists in a navy version (with the twin engine that most navies insist on) and it has better range.

      The Gripen has the disadvantage that it uses many US components (though most are license built in Europe) but the advantages of high availability, low cost per flight hour (much of it thanks to a minimal need for specialized mechanics. It’s more advanced components are essentially plug and play, allowing any mechanic to diagnose and replace a faulty component with a new one) and has the ability to land/rearm&refuel/take-off on a few hundred meters of sufficiently straight road (or an easter european style airbase. Something which the F-16 can’t). If you want to operate a competent and capable air force on a limited budget I don’t think there is a better fighter than the Gripen.

    13. Tough-Age-7405 on

      i would cancel all Deals of equipment where the US has the possibility to have a saying in deployment, technical or otherwise

    14. scotswaehey on

      I think we should stop buying F35s and invest that money into keeping the aircraft we have flying and also a European collaboration 6th generation stealth Aircraft and spin off drone versions.

      At this point because of Trump there is no point buying anything from the US as he has demonstrated he will cut you off when he feels like it. Just remember the US has large manufacturing capacity and that’s why they can sell equipment relatively cheap but that doesn’t necessarily translate in to quality. For too long European countries have relied on the easy option of buying US instead of investing in their own equipment. I can Guarantee at this moment the UK will be looking at what options they have to replace the trident missile system for their nuclear warheads.

    15. rush4you on

      Short term: Rafale, Eurofighter, Gripen with another engine.
      Medium term: license the KF-21 from the Koreans and change American equipment with European ones. The orders should be enough to finish developing the internal weapons bay ahead of schedule and to have a fully functional 5th gen fighter by 2030.
      Long term: Tempest or whatever 6th gen project you can develop, especially if you partner with Asian countries who are also wondering if the F-35 will be useful for them.

    16. Thelostrelic on

      As a Brit, I’d love to have the rafale for our carriers. (Obviously, the carriers would have to be refitted)

      The Rafale is after all the better looking brother of the Typhoon. The French really made a good looking fighter jet there.

      We really should work together (UK, France, Germany, Italy and anyone else who wants in) on a new F35 competitor or start on next gen.

    17. RugbyEdd on

      When I was doing a little research on them it seems they use license built American engines, which America can and has used to block the aircrafts sale.

      They are however fully built and maintained in Europe. So although America can legally block their sale, in a national security situation they can’t do shit. So if Russia invaded Europe and America ordered Sweden to stop making or using them, they’d likely be told in the most diplomatic way possible where to stick their legalities.

    18. deniercounter on

      Yes. I don’t believe fighter jets will be of importance in future wars. I bet on drones.

    19. VicenteOlisipo on

      Yes. Eurofighter, Rafale, Grippen. Yes, they’re older and not as capable, that’s a fact. But also they can’t be turned off (or just denied parts/support) because of a tantrum in the White House. Work on the new European fighter jets ASAP.

    Leave A Reply