Spagna per imporre multe massicce per non etichettare il contenuto generato dall’IA
https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/spain-impose-massive-fines-not-labelling-ai-generated-content-2025-03-11/
di MetaKnowing
Spagna per imporre multe massicce per non etichettare il contenuto generato dall’IA
https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/spain-impose-massive-fines-not-labelling-ai-generated-content-2025-03-11/
di MetaKnowing
16 commenti
Pedro Sánchez is quietly one of the best and most effective leaders in the EU
And he does it with a minority government.
Nice. Hope many more will follow.
>It would also prevent organisations from classifying people through their biometric data using AI, rating them based on their behaviour or personal traits to grant them access to benefits or assess their risk of committing a crime.
>However, authorities would still be allowed to use real-time biometric surveillance in public spaces for national security reasons.
We need more of this.
I just read a post about a person contacting the customer support of a company to ask if they can heat up a pre-cooked food in the oven and got a confident positive response from a chat bot. When they did, the container of the food melted. They contacted the customer support again and got an apology from the chat bot and information that in fact they should use only microwaves.
AI chat bots and anything AI generated should be clearly labeled, so people could know not to trust it entirely, if at all.
Fine them ‘til it hurts, then fine them some more.
👏 👏 👏
It’s mad though. There’s been so much talk around online safety and protecting children and no one mentions AI. Not even once. When a boy has already committed suicide prompted by an AI bot. Do we have to cripple another generation before we take AI seriously?
Megabased. To be emulated by all the EU in the future, we hope.
Lol I thought this was about labeling training data
How will this be enforced?
TBH I’m pessimistic about that – it will be like the initial version of cookie directive or „May contain trace amount of peanuts”. Basically – AI marked on everything to the point people stop caring and the message becomes invisible and irrelevant. Just another mandatory message to skip.
I wonder how do they want to verify if people are being classified with AI (versus regular algorithms) and why the former is worse than the latter?
So now people will just label everything as a AI to prevent fines? It’s not like companies can ever know for sure if their employees and/or contractors didn’t use AI.
The problem is that there is no way to tell whether an image is AI generated or not, unless it’s so obvious or bad quality that it would not even require the label probably
Programs like Photoshop use AI (machine learning) on many of the filters and brushes like the Spot Healing brush.
That’s pretty good 🙂
Everything should be labeled. I’m pro AI but against deception.
Great. However much more is needed
Technologically, it’s complicated. But legally, this is 100% the right call. Our society is already essentially entirely falsified already in a lot of places (think about the ‘value’ of companies like nVidia or fake influencers), we don’t need more of it.