It certainly is. Within the City boundaries there really isn’t any spot I can think of where you couldn’t walk to shops, restaurants, etc. There’s decent footpaths, street lighting, pedestrian crossings and very few barriers blocking access from A to B. Transit is a different story but lots of cities can be a complete pain in the hole to traverse by foot. Of course there’ll be a load of gobshites piling in moaning that they can’t walk from their hovel in Dunboyne to their office in Sandymount.
WalkerBotMan on
The graphic literally tells you the criteria, yet people are moaning about the ranking who obviously haven’t read them. Welcome to the Internet, I guess.
niko_starkiller on
I mean you really can walk anywhere in Dublin City also with the commercial centre being so small everything is kind of within a max 20 minute walk. Unfortunately though walking is sometimes the only option since the luas only going two directions and there’s no metro
lakehop on
The Danes are at it again
malilk on
That’s completely fair. I live on the edge of D1 and D3 and can walk basically anywhere in town in 25 to 60 mins. And I do quite often too. Some parts aren’t exactly nice to walk through with the dog shit everywhere but it’s mostly very walkable
sparksAndFizzles on
It is very walkable, if you live on O’Connell Street or Stephen’s Green or in the city centre somewhere. The issue is though that the vast, vast majority of Irish people don’t live in walkable distances from city centres – it’s changing a bit with the building of more apartments, but for the majority of us it’s a long trip to your nearest city centre.
Without good transit systems the cities aren’t very walkable in reality.
pablo8itall on
Dublin is really a collection of little villages.
I’ve noticed this eve more recently. Each of the those villages is lovely and walkable.
If we had an elected mayor with powers to push better coordination with the council it would be even more awesome.
Professional_Elk_489 on
Amsterdam is more walkable than Dublin and not even ranked : flatter, wider streets, less windy, slightly better weather, less boring empty gaps between places and smaller in geographical footprint
Acrobatic_Buddy_9444 on
probably because it’s so small compared
Ruamuffi on
Slightly unrelated but I struggle to believe that Marseille less walkable than Paris ?!
reillyrulz on
Which makes it all the more of a shame the over reliance on cars to make simple journeys.
Prestigious-Side-286 on
You can get off the train in Heuston and walk to pretty much every tourist destination in the city within 40 ish minutes.
PremiumTempus on
The definition of “walkability” here clearly differs from mine. Yes, footpaths are everywhere, but pedestrian priority is severely lacking. Pedestrian crosswalks were only legally recognised last year, whereas many European cities allow continuous walking without interruption—Kraków, for example, isn’t even on this list despite its excellent walkability. There, staying outside the city centre can mean a quicker walk in, whereas car-dominated cities like Rome or Dublin force long walks regardless, due to frequent traffic lights and a lack of pedestrian priority.
martyrunner on
Milan no 1? Never been but know a guy who got a tattoo off a guy from Milan who said it was a kip. He lives in Arklow now…
nomebi on
Prague is much more walkable than Dublin, I’ve noticed Dublnn is really good for bikes but everything is much closer together in Prague i feel like
TesticulusOrentus on
I guess if you live in parts of the city centre sure, but theres a whole lot of suburban sprawl where this just isnt true.
Far_Excitement4103 on
The world?
865Wallen on
Man the length of time of some traffic lights as a pedestrian is insane.
Feynization on
I think part of our ranking is that we have lots of smaller schools and smaller hospitals. That makes things more walkable without necessarily making things better for people. We only got our first trauma hospital in 2021 (the Mater) which doesn’t have a Neurosurgical centre. Having medium sized hospitals is good for communication between medical teams, but makes it harder to have all specialities under one roof. Rotterdam for example has the Erasmus centre which is an enormous hospital catering to a population similar to Dublin.
Hospitals being on this list is a bit silly. Accessibilty to people who cannot walk is more important to hospitals than the proximity to people who can walk.
Similarly I imagine that students who are less interested in traditional routes are left out by Irelands education set up. Bigger schools could offer a greater focus on subjects like design, engineering and computer science (bear in mind I’m over 10 years out incase those are mainstream now). I like that for most people schools are easy to get to, even if the cost is smaller schools, with fewer subjects offered.
All of this is to say that walkability for Ireland should focus on access to GPs, walking safety, pedestrian prioritisation, quality/quantity of shops. Not proximity to hospitals and schools that only a minority of the population frequently use.
efinegan1 on
It would want to be walkable as there sure as shit aint any reliable alternative transport options
ZombieConsciouss on
Great for walking, terrible for driving.
hopefulatwhatido on
It annoys me that I can’t complain about it
CoolMan-GCHQ- on
Er, so this is a statement that out public transport sucks, right?
fieldindex on
I have been in all those cities. Wow. I started checking them and surprised myself by the time I got to Minsk and St Petersburg.
jmcgnie on
It’s true. The buses don’t work in Dublin.
Stubber_NK on
I spent over a decade in Edinburgh.
It’s a million times more walkable than Dublin, as long as you are comfortable with hills.
nixass on
As if there’s any other option.
Also while walking there is a great chance to be smacked by the youth gangs
Unyx on
Does London really not make the list?
ishka_uisce on
If you live in the city centre, yes, which is probably what this measured (‘city limits’). Less so in the rest of it.
32 commenti
Great news. We can make it in the top 3 for sure.
[deleted]
because theres no metro and traffic is gridlocked
It certainly is. Within the City boundaries there really isn’t any spot I can think of where you couldn’t walk to shops, restaurants, etc. There’s decent footpaths, street lighting, pedestrian crossings and very few barriers blocking access from A to B. Transit is a different story but lots of cities can be a complete pain in the hole to traverse by foot. Of course there’ll be a load of gobshites piling in moaning that they can’t walk from their hovel in Dunboyne to their office in Sandymount.
The graphic literally tells you the criteria, yet people are moaning about the ranking who obviously haven’t read them. Welcome to the Internet, I guess.
I mean you really can walk anywhere in Dublin City also with the commercial centre being so small everything is kind of within a max 20 minute walk. Unfortunately though walking is sometimes the only option since the luas only going two directions and there’s no metro
The Danes are at it again
That’s completely fair. I live on the edge of D1 and D3 and can walk basically anywhere in town in 25 to 60 mins. And I do quite often too. Some parts aren’t exactly nice to walk through with the dog shit everywhere but it’s mostly very walkable
It is very walkable, if you live on O’Connell Street or Stephen’s Green or in the city centre somewhere. The issue is though that the vast, vast majority of Irish people don’t live in walkable distances from city centres – it’s changing a bit with the building of more apartments, but for the majority of us it’s a long trip to your nearest city centre.
Without good transit systems the cities aren’t very walkable in reality.
Dublin is really a collection of little villages.
I’ve noticed this eve more recently. Each of the those villages is lovely and walkable.
If we had an elected mayor with powers to push better coordination with the council it would be even more awesome.
Amsterdam is more walkable than Dublin and not even ranked : flatter, wider streets, less windy, slightly better weather, less boring empty gaps between places and smaller in geographical footprint
probably because it’s so small compared
Slightly unrelated but I struggle to believe that Marseille less walkable than Paris ?!
Which makes it all the more of a shame the over reliance on cars to make simple journeys.
You can get off the train in Heuston and walk to pretty much every tourist destination in the city within 40 ish minutes.
The definition of “walkability” here clearly differs from mine. Yes, footpaths are everywhere, but pedestrian priority is severely lacking. Pedestrian crosswalks were only legally recognised last year, whereas many European cities allow continuous walking without interruption—Kraków, for example, isn’t even on this list despite its excellent walkability. There, staying outside the city centre can mean a quicker walk in, whereas car-dominated cities like Rome or Dublin force long walks regardless, due to frequent traffic lights and a lack of pedestrian priority.
Milan no 1? Never been but know a guy who got a tattoo off a guy from Milan who said it was a kip. He lives in Arklow now…
Prague is much more walkable than Dublin, I’ve noticed Dublnn is really good for bikes but everything is much closer together in Prague i feel like
I guess if you live in parts of the city centre sure, but theres a whole lot of suburban sprawl where this just isnt true.
The world?
Man the length of time of some traffic lights as a pedestrian is insane.
I think part of our ranking is that we have lots of smaller schools and smaller hospitals. That makes things more walkable without necessarily making things better for people. We only got our first trauma hospital in 2021 (the Mater) which doesn’t have a Neurosurgical centre. Having medium sized hospitals is good for communication between medical teams, but makes it harder to have all specialities under one roof. Rotterdam for example has the Erasmus centre which is an enormous hospital catering to a population similar to Dublin.
Hospitals being on this list is a bit silly. Accessibilty to people who cannot walk is more important to hospitals than the proximity to people who can walk.
Similarly I imagine that students who are less interested in traditional routes are left out by Irelands education set up. Bigger schools could offer a greater focus on subjects like design, engineering and computer science (bear in mind I’m over 10 years out incase those are mainstream now). I like that for most people schools are easy to get to, even if the cost is smaller schools, with fewer subjects offered.
All of this is to say that walkability for Ireland should focus on access to GPs, walking safety, pedestrian prioritisation, quality/quantity of shops. Not proximity to hospitals and schools that only a minority of the population frequently use.
It would want to be walkable as there sure as shit aint any reliable alternative transport options
Great for walking, terrible for driving.
It annoys me that I can’t complain about it
Er, so this is a statement that out public transport sucks, right?
I have been in all those cities. Wow. I started checking them and surprised myself by the time I got to Minsk and St Petersburg.
It’s true. The buses don’t work in Dublin.
I spent over a decade in Edinburgh.
It’s a million times more walkable than Dublin, as long as you are comfortable with hills.
As if there’s any other option.
Also while walking there is a great chance to be smacked by the youth gangs
Does London really not make the list?
If you live in the city centre, yes, which is probably what this measured (‘city limits’). Less so in the rest of it.