The concept of ‘end times fascism’ reflects a broader trend where contemporary far-right movements, including figures like Trump and Musk, are increasingly adopting apocalyptic narratives that resonate with both religious and secular ideologies. This aligns with historical observations that fascism often embodies an ‘Armageddon complex,’ fixating on a final battle while lacking a hopeful vision for the future, as noted by philosopher Umberto Eco.
“To put it bluntly, the most powerful people in the world are preparing for the end of the world, an end they themselves are frenetically accelerating.”
We are up against end-times fascism.
ce_km_r_eng on
I tried to read it, but I cannot deal with the linguistic inflation. Could anyone with more perseverance offer a TL;DR other than “The end is nigh”?
Heavy_Practice_6597 on
How could we possibly stop it?!
– the many possible solutions
Yeah nah, let’s just screech about how everybody is going crazy for no reason.
B89983ikei on
The construction of high-end bunkers by members of the global elite is a well-documented phenomenon driven by tangible fears. Projects like Aerie in the U.S. and Vivos Europa One in Germany showcase billion-dollar investments in underground structures equipped with advanced survival technologies: air filtration systems against biological agents, artificial intelligence for resource management, and even digital replicas of outdoor landscapes. Companies such as Rising S Company report a 700% increase in sales since 2016, fueled by political and environmental crises. These figures reveal an amplified sense of risk among the ultra-wealthy, aligning with scientific warnings about pandemics, nuclear war, and global warming, 2024, for instance, recorded temperatures 1.75°C above pre-industrial levels, intensifying scenarios of climate collapse. The existence of these bunkers is not conspiracy theory but a concrete response to real threats, albeit distorted by economic privilege.
Yet, this trend exposes deep contradictions. While countries like Finland and Switzerland maintain public bunkers capable of sheltering entire populations, the elite opts for exclusive refuges like the Survival Condo in Kansas, where 3,600 sq. ft. units cost $4.5 million. Critics argue that such segregation mirrors and exacerbates inequalities: the wealthiest 1% holds 45% of global wealth but invests in isolation rather than collective crisis mitigation. Moreover, the effectiveness of these structures is questionable. Bunkers rely on complex ventilation and energy systems, vulnerable to technical failures, and their long-term sustainability remains uncertain, as stockpiled food cannot solve ecosystem collapse. Ultra-secretive projects like Oppidum in the Czech Republic operate under strict confidentiality, avoiding public scrutiny and raising ethical concerns about accountability and transparency.
The central paradox lies in the tension between individual preparation and collective action. On one hand, the elite demonstrates a pragmatic reading of global risks; on the other, their survival strategy ignores the inherent interdependence of modern crises. Climate scientists and economists warn that no bunker will protect its occupants if oceans acidify or food chains collapse. Thus, the construction of these underground fortresses may be less a solution and more a symptom of selective desperation, a tacit admission that economic power cannot buy immunity from systemic failures. Meanwhile, the window for coordinated responses, such as emission reductions and international cooperation, continues to close, leaving an unsettling question: Are bunkers a rational Plan B or the last fantasy of those who believe wealth can defy history?
By the way… when Elon Musk first started talking about going to Mars, he said exactly that—that the world wouldn’t be salvageable here, that Earth would undergo severe climate changes, and that, according to him, the only solution was to escape to Mars. But for Elon Musk, it seems easier to flee to Mars than to actually try doing something concrete for planet Earth!
EDIT: Since the OP is from Portugal… they’re selling bunkers there too!! SOLID BUNKERS (Portugal) offers customized structures starting at €60,000, highlighting concerns over nuclear and climate threats. Better buy one, OP!
LowRevolution6175 on
The Guardian’s business model is basically proclaiming this over and over and over
uraniumcovid on
that is an interesting take from the guardian considering their horrible transphobia
7 commenti
The concept of ‘end times fascism’ reflects a broader trend where contemporary far-right movements, including figures like Trump and Musk, are increasingly adopting apocalyptic narratives that resonate with both religious and secular ideologies. This aligns with historical observations that fascism often embodies an ‘Armageddon complex,’ fixating on a final battle while lacking a hopeful vision for the future, as noted by philosopher Umberto Eco.
* [Naomi Klein and Astra Taylor on Building a Movement to Fight ‘End …](https://www.commondreams.org/news/fight-fascism)
^(This is a bot made by [Critique AI](https://critique-labs.ai). If you want vetted information like this on all content you browse, [download our extension](https://critiquebrowser.app).)
“To put it bluntly, the most powerful people in the world are preparing for the end of the world, an end they themselves are frenetically accelerating.”
We are up against end-times fascism.
I tried to read it, but I cannot deal with the linguistic inflation. Could anyone with more perseverance offer a TL;DR other than “The end is nigh”?
How could we possibly stop it?!
– the many possible solutions
Yeah nah, let’s just screech about how everybody is going crazy for no reason.
The construction of high-end bunkers by members of the global elite is a well-documented phenomenon driven by tangible fears. Projects like Aerie in the U.S. and Vivos Europa One in Germany showcase billion-dollar investments in underground structures equipped with advanced survival technologies: air filtration systems against biological agents, artificial intelligence for resource management, and even digital replicas of outdoor landscapes. Companies such as Rising S Company report a 700% increase in sales since 2016, fueled by political and environmental crises. These figures reveal an amplified sense of risk among the ultra-wealthy, aligning with scientific warnings about pandemics, nuclear war, and global warming, 2024, for instance, recorded temperatures 1.75°C above pre-industrial levels, intensifying scenarios of climate collapse. The existence of these bunkers is not conspiracy theory but a concrete response to real threats, albeit distorted by economic privilege.
Yet, this trend exposes deep contradictions. While countries like Finland and Switzerland maintain public bunkers capable of sheltering entire populations, the elite opts for exclusive refuges like the Survival Condo in Kansas, where 3,600 sq. ft. units cost $4.5 million. Critics argue that such segregation mirrors and exacerbates inequalities: the wealthiest 1% holds 45% of global wealth but invests in isolation rather than collective crisis mitigation. Moreover, the effectiveness of these structures is questionable. Bunkers rely on complex ventilation and energy systems, vulnerable to technical failures, and their long-term sustainability remains uncertain, as stockpiled food cannot solve ecosystem collapse. Ultra-secretive projects like Oppidum in the Czech Republic operate under strict confidentiality, avoiding public scrutiny and raising ethical concerns about accountability and transparency.
The central paradox lies in the tension between individual preparation and collective action. On one hand, the elite demonstrates a pragmatic reading of global risks; on the other, their survival strategy ignores the inherent interdependence of modern crises. Climate scientists and economists warn that no bunker will protect its occupants if oceans acidify or food chains collapse. Thus, the construction of these underground fortresses may be less a solution and more a symptom of selective desperation, a tacit admission that economic power cannot buy immunity from systemic failures. Meanwhile, the window for coordinated responses, such as emission reductions and international cooperation, continues to close, leaving an unsettling question: Are bunkers a rational Plan B or the last fantasy of those who believe wealth can defy history?
By the way… when Elon Musk first started talking about going to Mars, he said exactly that—that the world wouldn’t be salvageable here, that Earth would undergo severe climate changes, and that, according to him, the only solution was to escape to Mars. But for Elon Musk, it seems easier to flee to Mars than to actually try doing something concrete for planet Earth!
EDIT: Since the OP is from Portugal… they’re selling bunkers there too!! SOLID BUNKERS (Portugal) offers customized structures starting at €60,000, highlighting concerns over nuclear and climate threats. Better buy one, OP!
The Guardian’s business model is basically proclaiming this over and over and over
that is an interesting take from the guardian considering their horrible transphobia