Nuovo piano per consentire la denominazione di violenti abusatori domestici nei casi di diritto di famiglia
https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/new-plan-to-allow-naming-of-violent-domestic-abusers-in-family-law-cases/a222021597.html
di PoppedCork
6 commenti
Good to see these changes
Another example of judges batting for the abusers. Idiots.
>New research recommended a new distinction between public and private information, where people sharing their experiences of the family law court with a trusted family member or relevant party would not be classed as a breach of the in-camera rule.
>The report detailed one case in which a child’s guardian explained to the child’s school that they were going through an extremely difficult and stressful family law case, by way of explaining a sick note for the child.
>**The judge in that case then invited the perpetrator to apply for a breach of the in-camera rule, arguing that telling the school about it had broken the rule.**
>Others detailed how they felt they could not access counselling during some of the “lowest” points in their lives, because they feared prosecution for breaching the privacy rules.
>Judges who spoke to researchers confirmed that their understanding was that speaking to a therapist about in-camera rule cases would be a breach of the privacy law.
Jesus. Yep, change is really needed.
Honestly not sure this is a good idea. As-is domestic violence orders are generally made for most applications. I could see a judge now taking the naming implication into account for cases that aren’t clear cut and maybe refusing to grant an order.
McGregor won’t like that
Could see how this can cut both ways, it could leave the family open to more attacks.
I spoke to a woman a few years ago whose violent ex husband was making threats against both her and their 11 year old son, threatening to kill the wee lad.
It was horrific but what’s worse is his family were helping him harass her.