Ciao dall’India, come voi ragazzi dovete essere consapevoli, c’è un conflitto in Pakistan in India in corso dove la Turchia ha fortemente sostenuto il Pakistan con droni e attrezzature per la difesa.
In riconoscimento di questo tacito Turkish supporta il movimento per boicottare il trave/il turismo in Turchia e Azerbaigian e promuovere l’Armenia/Georgia poiché le alternative ha guadagnato trazione in India.
Durante una discussione su questo boicottaggio, un utente ha sottolineato che non dovremmo visitare paesi che eseguono i genocidi in primo luogo e la sezione commenti è stata immediatamente razziata da negazionisti del genocidio turco.
Volevo solo capire quanto sia comune perché questo è un piccolo sottomarino locale come hanno scoperto i turchi. È comune nella tua regione? Vedo che hai anche un post post per questo.
https://i.redd.it/fzmma3inc30f1.jpeg
di BreadfruitThese3361
2 commenti
Dude it’s disturbingly common, it’s caked into their national agenda.
If you notice they all use the same punch line
“Armenian gangs” “Armenian thugs”
You will see patterns it baked into a lot of their brains from school and their communities. What’s even funnier is millions of Turks are just crypto Armenians islamized forced to identify and become Turkish so it’s like they’re hating themselves. It’s ridiculous
Welcome to our world. (I’m Assyrian, a people subject to a parallel genocide along with the Armenians.)
Turkey likes to pretend that the intentional eradication of the Armenian, Assyrian, and Pontic Greek populations in the current borders of Turkey was an unintended side effect of a completely reasonable large-scale relocation movement during World War I, because these populations could not be trusted to not ally with the Ottoman Empire’s enemies. Turkey, Azerbaijan, (and Pakistan for some reason), therefore believe that (1) there was no genocide because it was unintentional, (2) that those communities deserved it because they would have become enemies, and (3) that they are proud that they defeated this invented insurgency. Just to be clear, in case it isn’t, this is a lie and one for which there is significant evidence to the contrary. If you would like to discuss further, just ask.
What I often tell people is that the show *Man in the High Castle* is our actual reality. The Committee of Union and Progress (CUP — the ruling coalition of the Ottoman Empire from 1913-1919) achieved its objective and Ataturk was the post-CUP, less crazy version that preserved the social “victory” of the CUP.
Unfortunately, you just got swept up in our normal Tuesday.