Share.

    9 commenti

    1. nicubunu on

      Any chance for the EU army to grow the same in the next 10 years?

    2. Remarkable_Top_5323 on

      Fuck NATO. If anyone needs more reasons to I’m willing to provide.

    3. ExpressAssist0819 on

      Ah yes, the red scare. That wonderful time period that made us forget the point was to stop fascism and focus on labeling anything that might whiff of left leaning anti-fascist resistance as “communist”.

    4. Sherbert-Vast on

      This does imply that NATO was weak after WW2.

      The Russians did not just shrug off WW2, large parts of their country where destroyed. In contrast to the US.

      This implies the Russians could’ve just walked over Nato in 1949. Which is wrong on so many levels.

      Nato members 1949

      >NATO’s original members in 1949 were [Belgium](https://www.britannica.com/place/Belgium), [Canada](https://www.britannica.com/place/Canada), [Denmark](https://www.britannica.com/place/Denmark), [France](https://www.britannica.com/place/France), [Iceland](https://www.britannica.com/place/Iceland), [Italy](https://www.britannica.com/place/Italy), [Luxembourg](https://www.britannica.com/place/Luxembourg), the [Netherlands](https://www.britannica.com/place/Netherlands), [Norway](https://www.britannica.com/place/Norway), [Portugal](https://www.britannica.com/place/Portugal), the [United Kingdom](https://www.britannica.com/place/United-Kingdom), and the [United States](https://www.britannica.com/place/United-States).

      This looks like cold war propaganda.

    Leave A Reply