I find this completely compelling. Solar is not a threat to farmers. It is good for farmers. It helps farmers diversify and secure stable income in an unstable market. It also lets farmers who want to slow down, farm less without suffering financially.
Let people do what they want with their land, I say. If it’s best for them to put up a few solar panels, good for them. Especially when the move benefits everyone in the country and even globally
Horror_Finish7951 on
The numbers in that piece are staggering. One farm going from dairy to solar will power 50,000 homes and bring about an instantaneous drop in methane.
I don’t know what more evidence you need that solar is the way to go. I’ll never understand opposition to it.
cool_much on
TLDR:
– **Political hypocrisy is undermining energy progress:** Micheál Martin calls solar a “game changer” in March, then months earlier warned against “40 shades of green being replaced with 40 shades of grey” – this confusion is hampering the industry
– **The scale argument is manufactured hysteria:** Meeting all 2030 solar targets requires just 0.3% of farmland – yet politicians like James O’Connor claim one farm switching will have “devastating consequences for the dairy industry”
– **We’re prioritizing the wrong kind of security:** Ireland imports €10 billion in fossil fuels annually while exporting 90% of dairy production to places like China – energy independence should trump providing “bulk powdered milk to Chinese mums”
– **The environmental math is backwards:** Removing 1,000 dairy cows eliminates massive methane emissions, water pollution from slurry, and imported chemical fertilizers, while solar farms actually support more biodiversity than surrounding farmland
– **Our livestock sector is the real problem:** We import 4/5 of the food we eat and millions of tonnes of animal feed – if we’re worried about food security, the “grossly oversized livestock sector” is what needs scrutiny, not solar farms
– **This one case proves the larger dysfunction:** The Greenhills controversy shows how politicians are getting “off the fence” in the wrong direction, opposing clean energy that would power 50,000+ homes while defending an unsustainable dairy expansion
irradiatiessence on
James O Connor is lying on this topic, he has to know better surely. The farm with 1000 cows was hardly a paragon for sustainability.
It does seem a bit off to use farmland rather than rooftops, car parks, and other already developed sites for solar?
ponkie_guy on
Am I missing something here? A farmer wants to use use his farm for solar panels instead dairy farming. Leaving aside the environmental impacts, isn’t it their right to do what they want with the land? I don’t understand what right the FF TD has to tell them they have to continue milking cows. And based on the size of that farm, it’s not a young lad from the area who wants to run his own farm who is losing out on the opportunity because Solar Panels are being installed.
7 commenti
I find this completely compelling. Solar is not a threat to farmers. It is good for farmers. It helps farmers diversify and secure stable income in an unstable market. It also lets farmers who want to slow down, farm less without suffering financially.
Let people do what they want with their land, I say. If it’s best for them to put up a few solar panels, good for them. Especially when the move benefits everyone in the country and even globally
The numbers in that piece are staggering. One farm going from dairy to solar will power 50,000 homes and bring about an instantaneous drop in methane.
I don’t know what more evidence you need that solar is the way to go. I’ll never understand opposition to it.
TLDR:
– **Political hypocrisy is undermining energy progress:** Micheál Martin calls solar a “game changer” in March, then months earlier warned against “40 shades of green being replaced with 40 shades of grey” – this confusion is hampering the industry
– **The scale argument is manufactured hysteria:** Meeting all 2030 solar targets requires just 0.3% of farmland – yet politicians like James O’Connor claim one farm switching will have “devastating consequences for the dairy industry”
– **We’re prioritizing the wrong kind of security:** Ireland imports €10 billion in fossil fuels annually while exporting 90% of dairy production to places like China – energy independence should trump providing “bulk powdered milk to Chinese mums”
– **The environmental math is backwards:** Removing 1,000 dairy cows eliminates massive methane emissions, water pollution from slurry, and imported chemical fertilizers, while solar farms actually support more biodiversity than surrounding farmland
– **Our livestock sector is the real problem:** We import 4/5 of the food we eat and millions of tonnes of animal feed – if we’re worried about food security, the “grossly oversized livestock sector” is what needs scrutiny, not solar farms
– **This one case proves the larger dysfunction:** The Greenhills controversy shows how politicians are getting “off the fence” in the wrong direction, opposing clean energy that would power 50,000+ homes while defending an unsustainable dairy expansion
James O Connor is lying on this topic, he has to know better surely. The farm with 1000 cows was hardly a paragon for sustainability.
https://m.independent.ie/farming/news/it-could-lead-to-devastating-consequences-for-the-dairy-industry-massive-cork-solar-farm-on-top-dairy-site-criticised-by-local-td/a1229256620.html
How does the drainage work?
It does seem a bit off to use farmland rather than rooftops, car parks, and other already developed sites for solar?
Am I missing something here? A farmer wants to use use his farm for solar panels instead dairy farming. Leaving aside the environmental impacts, isn’t it their right to do what they want with the land? I don’t understand what right the FF TD has to tell them they have to continue milking cows. And based on the size of that farm, it’s not a young lad from the area who wants to run his own farm who is losing out on the opportunity because Solar Panels are being installed.