IDF doing what the IDF does – committing war crimes.
C0smicdread on
Crazy how those shots fired themselves
IsNotPolitburo on
Sure is weird how the headline avoids mentioning who was *firing* those shots.
Sciprio on
When my dad joined the Irish army after the British army in the 60s or 70s in Lebanon they used to do the same with artillery, They’d fire it over their heads, and it would land a short distance away, basically letting them know that they could hit them if they wanted.
If they do this to diplomats and supposed “Allies” then i can only imagine the trouble that Palestinians are going through.
I’m beginning to see why most of their neighbours don’t like them, and it’s nothing about being Jewish but instead the Israeli government and their army acting like thugs.
OffOption on
… Who fired the shots BBC? Sure seems like important information, wouldnt you think?
PoppedCork on
The IDF really want to kill Irish people, blood thirsty murderers
ConsistentMorning174 on
zero consequences as always.
SaraHHHBK on
Shots firing themselves huh?
xzbobzx on
The passive voice strikes again.
Or should I say the headline was struck by an unmentioned party.
Otritet on
Don’t be shy tell us who was it.
Marcysdad on
“It was the moral thing to do!” – idf
Dr_Toehold on
By whom?
mirnes55 on
I am genuinely interested in their reasoning. How do they justity these occurences? I suppose everyone considers themselves righteous, in their own perspective.
_-Burninat0r-_ on
I just want to know one thing:
Are these mistakes, or Israeli soldiers being like “fuck it let’s shoot at the UN”? What kind of spotting equipment do they have? Was anything (not) communicated to the soldiers?
I know a lot of people like to automatically assume the worst and maybe it is on purpose, but, while I’ve never been in war, I know any warzone is chaos, people are paranoid AF and up to 20-25% of casualties the US military suffered during GWOT were either friendly fire incidents or general war related incidents, not from enemy fire. From a diplomatic standpoint it’s a terrible fucking idea for Israel to fire at UN troops.
**Is there any evidence for whether it’s an accident or on purpose?** And no, it happening multiple times doesn’t prove it’s on purpose. It’s not like making a mistake once reduced the chaos and paranoia of war.
EireOfTheNorth on
🤡🤡🤡 ‘The BBC has to remain neutral’ 🤡🤡🤡
They shoot at our diplomats, they shoot at our peacekeepers. They use tank shells on our bases.
The BBC never remained ‘neutral’ when it was Russian actions in Ukraine, they said who shot, who killed. But with Israel? Palestinians *die* and Israelis are *killed/murdered*.
It’s active language versus passive language. Omission versus inclusion.
It is not coincidence either, to avoid any doubt. If you study media at any sort of level you are taught about this academically. It will be brought up time and time again and you will look at left wing, centrist, and right wing sources of news and how their use of language differs. I studied media and politics at Queens University Belfast – it was brought up a lot, there are entire books on the subject. There are no coincidental turns of phrase in the media, it’s all intentional – and the omission of Israel in this headline follows the BBCs long held pro Israel bias. I imagine this bias would even continue if it was British forces being fired on.
GewoonFrankk on
Surely the idf has the right to protect itself from Irish peacekeepers
tkyjonathan on
Random small arms fire with no evidence, Jews to blame.. obvs /s
bakedfruit420 on
IDF love committing warcrimes
FruitLoopes421 on
Oh shit UN being useless as always. Anyway
dancingp1g on
Israelis are at it again but but but antisemitic
Ferengi_Quark on
These titles always seem to exclude the perpetrator when it’s the Israelis…
Baba_NO_Riley on
was it Elijah?
Middle-Cloud-4814 on
Antisemitism antisemitism, Hamas, October 7. They don’t give a fuck
lockedinforthebigLC on
Wonder who fired those shots
Rich-Highway-1116 on
I suspect it was them too but unless they admit to it, little bit too early for a complete investigation.
hemijaimatematika1 on
“EU patriots” are coming to defend those who fired shots at EU personel
Random_n4m3 on
Gotta love all the soft language used whenever it’s the zionists committing war crimes.
Enough is enough, call them what they are, terrorists.
28 commenti
IDF doing what the IDF does – committing war crimes.
Crazy how those shots fired themselves
Sure is weird how the headline avoids mentioning who was *firing* those shots.
When my dad joined the Irish army after the British army in the 60s or 70s in Lebanon they used to do the same with artillery, They’d fire it over their heads, and it would land a short distance away, basically letting them know that they could hit them if they wanted.
If they do this to diplomats and supposed “Allies” then i can only imagine the trouble that Palestinians are going through.
I’m beginning to see why most of their neighbours don’t like them, and it’s nothing about being Jewish but instead the Israeli government and their army acting like thugs.
… Who fired the shots BBC? Sure seems like important information, wouldnt you think?
The IDF really want to kill Irish people, blood thirsty murderers
zero consequences as always.
Shots firing themselves huh?
The passive voice strikes again.
Or should I say the headline was struck by an unmentioned party.
Don’t be shy tell us who was it.
“It was the moral thing to do!” – idf
By whom?
I am genuinely interested in their reasoning. How do they justity these occurences? I suppose everyone considers themselves righteous, in their own perspective.
I just want to know one thing:
Are these mistakes, or Israeli soldiers being like “fuck it let’s shoot at the UN”? What kind of spotting equipment do they have? Was anything (not) communicated to the soldiers?
I know a lot of people like to automatically assume the worst and maybe it is on purpose, but, while I’ve never been in war, I know any warzone is chaos, people are paranoid AF and up to 20-25% of casualties the US military suffered during GWOT were either friendly fire incidents or general war related incidents, not from enemy fire. From a diplomatic standpoint it’s a terrible fucking idea for Israel to fire at UN troops.
**Is there any evidence for whether it’s an accident or on purpose?** And no, it happening multiple times doesn’t prove it’s on purpose. It’s not like making a mistake once reduced the chaos and paranoia of war.
🤡🤡🤡 ‘The BBC has to remain neutral’ 🤡🤡🤡
They shoot at our diplomats, they shoot at our peacekeepers. They use tank shells on our bases.
The BBC never remained ‘neutral’ when it was Russian actions in Ukraine, they said who shot, who killed. But with Israel? Palestinians *die* and Israelis are *killed/murdered*.
It’s active language versus passive language. Omission versus inclusion.
It is not coincidence either, to avoid any doubt. If you study media at any sort of level you are taught about this academically. It will be brought up time and time again and you will look at left wing, centrist, and right wing sources of news and how their use of language differs. I studied media and politics at Queens University Belfast – it was brought up a lot, there are entire books on the subject. There are no coincidental turns of phrase in the media, it’s all intentional – and the omission of Israel in this headline follows the BBCs long held pro Israel bias. I imagine this bias would even continue if it was British forces being fired on.
Surely the idf has the right to protect itself from Irish peacekeepers
Random small arms fire with no evidence, Jews to blame.. obvs /s
IDF love committing warcrimes
Oh shit UN being useless as always. Anyway
Israelis are at it again but but but antisemitic
These titles always seem to exclude the perpetrator when it’s the Israelis…
was it Elijah?
Antisemitism antisemitism, Hamas, October 7. They don’t give a fuck
Wonder who fired those shots
I suspect it was them too but unless they admit to it, little bit too early for a complete investigation.
“EU patriots” are coming to defend those who fired shots at EU personel
Gotta love all the soft language used whenever it’s the zionists committing war crimes.
Enough is enough, call them what they are, terrorists.
World’s most “Moral” army strikes again.