Scots Onlyfans Insegnante che ha venduto foto di rating X da trasportare davanti a Watchdog

Not surprised, it’d be one thing if she quietly did it on the side, but she’s always getting herself in the news, including, as this article mentions, back in 2022 while she was still a teacher.

Discretely doing it is one thing, getting yourself in the national news so all of her teenage students know they can get pictures of her tits is quite another.

A masquerade mask and a fake name is all it takes folks, come on.

Call me a prude, but surely moonlighting as an adult star while working in a job around children is pushing it, no?

I didn’t even know that there is a specific Scots Onlyfans, let alone that there are people who teach it.

To be fair, she’s resigned and is probably going to make an absolute fortune from all this publicity.

Dads everywhere racking up thousands on the joint account.

“won’t somebody please think of the children”

Fake moral outrage because of parents failure.

I feel like this is a case of ideal world vs real world.

In an ideal world, yes she definitely should be allowed to do whatever she wants with her time off the clock. That feels like the right position to have.

But in the real world, this is over the line for a teacher because of all the things others have highlighted here; principally the possible access of kids to porn and other OF content. Because ideally kids wouldn’t have that access, but they do.

Also it’s different in a role where someone isn’t working with children IMO.

I expect there are literally thousands of women on the public payroll moonlighting on various pay platforms.

1. If she wants to work OFs then that’s her choice. People will sell sex and nudes, because people want it, etc

2. That is incompatible with certain professions. If you work retail or in the office or whatever, it’s a private life thing. If you work something more public service (education especially where u18s are concerned) that tends to raise eyebrows.

3. I know this is also down to parenting, and responsibility of them and their kids, but there are ways people leak things. Don’t forget teenagers will teenage. Such a thing in a classroom would make that difficult on here.

Now getting more publicity to make more money off it. Clever

Is it against the terms and conditions of her employment contract? Is anything that she has done illegal? If not then it’s all fine.

If she has breached her contract then appropriate steps may be taken. It’s a matter of employment law not some moral grandstanding issue.

One of my teachers in Year 11 was a pretty attractive redhead in her late twenties/early thirties.

A boy in our class found a topless photo on the internet of a lady who looked almost exactly like her. The photo was quickly shared among pupils in the school and at the time, I didn’t believe it was her and actually felt bad for her.

Didn’t know if anything else came of it until I went for drinks with my best friend a few years back…

Turns out, the school found out about the photo, suspended her, did their own investigation and found out she was doing porn on the side while she was studying for her degree and PGCE. She was promptly sacked.

> The physics teacher claimed she only started to post images to make money amid a pay row. She later claimed to have made £60,000 in just one month by sharing photos of herself on the adult site.

If you’re making £60,000 a month from OF, why the fuck are you still in education? You’ll have enough money to comfortably retire on after just a year or two of selling your body to lonely desperate men.

Ok, let’s cut through the faux outrage. If this lady was your teacher and you are a teenage boy then your life is complete if someone sends you her pics.

Human sexuality researcher here, and I actually did my thesis about pornography, childrens relationship to porn, it’s impact on children, and the impact of censorship of pornography on both adults and children.

The fact of the matter is that kids being able to access porn isn’t any kind of moral failure either on the parents or the pornographers part, it’s the natural result of technological progression.
When engaged in these discussions of morality we fail to recognise that we put this technology in their pockets when they’re infants. The kids grew up with it, the adults responsible for regulating and controlling it did not, so we’re already at a disadvantage, by the time they are teens they already know this technology better than the average adult ever could.
They know how to get around parental blocks, they know about VPNs and how to use them, they know how to circumvent censorship and get around age verification.
It’s astounding how many cant see that the Internet was pandoras box and it cannot be closed again. It’s the wild west, and it doesn’t matter what you do to regulate or control it, there will always be ways around that regulation, new tools to circumvent censorship, and the kids know it.

Every time an MP talks about making the Internet safer for kids, anyone who truly understands how the Internet works, laughs, because we know that what they are proposing is a statistical impossibility.
We’re long past the tipping point on that, and now there’s really only one truly effective way to stop children seeing certain things on the Internet, and thats to shut the Internet down entirely.

Research has shown that kids as young as 11 are actively and intentionally seeking out porn, it’s not an ‘accident’ they come across it, they know how to get to it, where to look for it, how to get around the blocks. The reason they seek it out overwhelmingly points to a woefully inadequate sexual education. (Most people don’t even realise that schools in the UK weren’t even legally required to provide sexual education until 2019, so that should give you an indication of where we’re at!).)
The real moral failure is that in a capitalist society that uses sex to sell absolutely everything, where we all, including children, are surrounded by subliminal sexual messages, sexual overtures, and sexualised everything, haven’t considered that kids might be a bit curious about this thing that’s everywhere but for some reason is the one thing adults don’t want to talk about.
It’s a moral failure that we shy away from proper comprehensive education “to protect their innocence” when modern sexuality is a minefield of consent, abuse and trauma issues and the only weapon we give them to deal is a rubber sheath.

Kids are using porn to educate themselves because the adults refuse to and that’s society’s failing, each and every one of us. If you don’t want kids to be curious about sex and porn, stop refusing to talk candidly to them about it.

As for the harms of porn, generally speaking the Internet is causing harm to everyone, and we could debate about those harms all day, but when it comes to porn, numerous research has shown that it only causes harm to children because they don’t have the proper contextual information through which to view it.

When we watch general media with our kids, movies, TV & games, we make it clear to them through both implicit and explicit messaging that what they are viewing isn’t real, it’s a fantasy, this is make believe, just a story portrayed by actors and fictional characters.

Who gives them that same context with porn?
Who explains to them that porn is a commercial product designed to be visually stimulating, but just because it looks good it doesn’t mean it feels good?
Who explains to them that the performers are actors, playing make believe for the sake of this commercial product? Who explains that Stacy only let 10 guys do that to her because she got paid a lot of money and has kids to feed, not because she necessarily likes it?
Who explains that this is fantasy material, and actually even though it cam be fun to watch, most people wouldn’t like that in real life, just like they wouldn’t like to go round shooting people like they do in all the video games?

That’s where the harm comes in, kids arent watching porn for fun, it’s instructional for them, because whether we like it or not most are already having sex, and yes, some even as young as 11. They see porn and think it’s real, then try to re-enact it, nobody gave them the proper context to understand that 14 year old Jenny isn’t going to like being choked actually.

It is our denial (to young people anyway) of the existence of porn, and our refusal to have candid adult conversations with them that is really causing the harm.

We’ve created a sexualised world where innocence is lost at a very young age, then lie to ourselves and cling to the notion that we can somehow maintain the innocence that’s already lost, instead of actively educating and preparing these young people for something that can be wonderful if you know what you’re doing, but incredibly destructive if you don’t.

Which brings me to the impact of censorship, which it turns out is also harmful. Apart from the fact that censorship only generates more curiosity in young people (and then fails to protect them from it because the Internet can’t actually be truly censored) it sends the message that human sexuality, this perfectly natural biological necessity that ensures the continuation of our species, is “wrong”. Imagine how confusing it is for young people to be told that the very thing we have surrounded them with in all our sexual messaging is wrong? Talk about head f*ck. Then, the more we make them understand it’s wrong, the less they will want to talk to us about it, they’ll turn to porn for education even more, the less ability we’ll have to help them if they really do endanger themselves.

You can really only keep children safe, and therefore maintain any real sense of innocence by being honest and open.
Have we maintained the innocence of the boy who was charged for assault after choking his girlfriend because he didn’t know any better?
Have we maintained the innocence of his girlfriend who is now a victim of sexual assault, or of the countless girls that think they have to do certain things to do sex right because nobody told them actually they don’t have to?

We’re doing this all backwards.

As for the morality of a teachers sexuality, whether public or private, what kind of message do we think it sends to teenage boys, if we reinforce the idea that because they’ve seen this womens vagina, she no longer has moral standing or authority? You’re shaming the female form, you’re punishing female sexuality, you’re negating a womans right to enjoy and celebrate her sexuality and reinforcing the idea of the saintly Madonna or the nasty whore, youre teaching boys that once they’ve witnessed a womans sexuality, she’s worthless.
You’re directly contributing to the rise of misogyny.

And if there’s anything I can tell you about what I’ve learnt in my 2 decades of research on human sexuality, it is this:

Misogyny is a much more prevalent and ever rising danger to your children, than them seeing 2 adults consensually having sex will ever be.

Pick your poison wisely.