Ho queste opzioni per i prezzi dell’elettricità da Helen, quello senza carbonio è più economico a 0,29 centesimi. Tuttavia, c’è una presa qui? I prezzi più economici e il carbonio sono ovviamente più attraenti, ma perché dovrebbero darmi altre opzioni più costose e meno rispettose dell’ambiente? Si prega di consultare le due foto allegate.
Grazie per l’aiuto.
https://www.reddit.com/gallery/1l3vt8u
di Similar_Honey433
8 commenti
Carbon free options will be 4.96 + spot price + marginal of 0.49 + 0.29 (hiilivapaa) + 2.90, so these are on-top addons basically.
I’m fairly sure the price of the carbon free option is added on top of the regular fee.
Also please keep in mind that the electricity contract in the first image is a spot-priced one. In practice, you’d be paying whatever the Nord pool spot price is for the time slot plus 0,49c/kWh margin (and optionally plus 0,29c/kWh for the carbon free option)
Hiilivapaa and Uusiutuva are both just add-ons in case you want to pay even more.
They are **additional** prices for making you think you choose better for the environment. As far as I know, your electricity comes from the same place regardless of which add-ons you choose, so I just go for the basic one.
The catch is that you are offered to pay additional 2.90€/month and 0,29 cent/kWh on top of 4,96€/month and 0,49 cent/kWh, while it is not explained clearly
So it will be 4,96+2,90=7,86 and 0,49+0,29+current electricity market price=0,78+current price
If you don’t have direct electric heating, pörssisähkö is the way to go. You can adjust your consumption to the cheapest hours.
The last two options are just to test how gullible consumers are
Don’t know if this was the question, but “uusiutuva” is the most environmentally friendly. It contains only renewables like wind and solar, where carbon free includes also nuclear. But both are eco friendly options.