Close Menu
    Europa

    Le società europee in ritardo nell’intelligenza artificiale per l’assunzione

    Share.
    View 25 Comments

    25 commenti

    1. saschaleib on

      Thank goodness there are still companies which didn’t fall for this scam!

    3. nim_opet on

      Good. AI for hiring is a disease, and is being equally exploited by AI for spamming every job posting with “tailored” resumes from around the globe. At this point it’s machines feeding machines

    4. Physical-Amount-4469 on

      You certainly meant EU companies aren’t dumb enough to use AI tools to hire utterly incompetent recruits.

    5. IronicStrikes on

      Recruiting was so ridiculously incompetent every time I’ve had to deal with them, I’m not even sure whether AI could make it worse.

    6. hmtk1976 on

      This doesn´t sound like bad news. Sure, AI may be useful in the hiring process somewhere but human interaction is vastly more important. AFAIK AI isn´t able to see nuances in personal interactions and that´s kinda important IMO.

    9. CC-5576-05 on

      >Most European companies still have not adopted AI and automation on their career sites, leaving job seekers wanting more personal experiences.

      Show me one real human that would rather get auto rejected by an algorithm because their cv was missing one keyword than have an actual person look at your application

    10. HistoryJust5266 on

      Good. Anybody who knows anything about the current state of AI should be completely against using it for hiring in any way, shape or form.

    12. Upstairs-Pool72 on

      Kinda ironic, given that we invented the Turing Test

    13. Loves_Poetry on

      Hiring with AI is a disaster. These AI tools will try to hire the most standard candidate you can imagine, because that’s the kind of data it was trained on. It will discard candidates from certain backgrounds because they don’t match with its training data

      Yes, that means with AI you can now automate discrimination in your hiring process and blame it on the machine.

    14. berejser on

      If recruiters are allowed to use tools and shortcuts to do their job, then it becomes morally acceptable for applicants to use the same tools and shortcuts. Let’s not have a race to the bottom.

    15. biebiep on

      What do you mean “lagging”?

      The EU AI act specifically says AI applications during hiring and screening of employees is a “high risk” to “unacceptable risk” practice.

      We’re not lagging, we’re following legislation. We had to cancel 3-4 initiatives if AI use in our HR department.

    18. Difficult_Newt9795 on

      High time we realize that AI isn’t stealing jobs, but creating new ones. Embrace change, Europe

    20. Tramagust on

      AI for hiring is classed as a high risk AI in the EU according to the AI act. Nobody wants that kind of red tape.

    21. SaphirRose on

      The article is written like that’s a bad thing. In fact i would make it super illegal for companies or states to use AI in order to make decisions that are of major consequence for humans. In fact people should have a right that if doubting that some decision was made by an AI they could demand a human manager to tell them in person or call..

      Ai should stick to casual chatting, programming and sexual role plays.

    23. Drumbelgalf on

      You act like that’s a bad thing. It’s absolutely not.

      Thoe systems only repeat bad decisions from the past.

    24. Fun-Dentist4667 on

      Time for Europe to stop lagging and start leading in AI hiring

    25. misanthropemalist on

      I was recently invited to an interview (by email). They asked to feel the forms, etc. In the form there was embedded a short interview with AI.

      I sent reply to recruiter (name: Meli) following email:

      “Hi there Meli,

      Sure, I’ll arrange with my hand to contact your AI.

      Thanks & regards”

    Leave A Reply