Oh good because that’ll stop the murderers from strangling people.
KindlyReflection6020 on
Creating a law banning something is easy. Enforcing the law and making the ban effective is a different matter entirely.
daviejambo on
Sounds good but how are they going to enforce that exactly?
meinnit99900 on
That’ll be incredibly hard to enforce given that what years ago would’ve been considered extreme content is now just a normal part of porn- I welcome it though honestly, people hate criticising what gets them off but constant access to extreme porn is fucking up peoples brains and attitude towards sex
cornedbeef101 on
As long as they don’t ban the system of a down song by mistake.
ICutDownTrees on
How exactly is this going to work? Is this basically a porn ban?
HenrikBanjo on
But real violence they won’t even bother to prosecute.
UK justice is now just a performative space for virtue signalling.
Enforce the existing laws before implementing unenforceable new ones.
Euclid_Interloper on
Other than political virtue signalling, what does a ban actually achieve?
Anyone with an ounce of digital literacy knows how to use a VPN. Actually, you’d be kind of silly not to use a VPN these days.
Cpt_TomMoores_jacuzi on
Ok, so, firstly I want to say that there are absolutely issues with this kind of sexual practice – there are obviously non-consensual acts of choking during sex, which everyone should be able to agree is totally unacceptable (though a 2022 survey suggested that 92% of people reporting sexual choking said it was consensual so, it isn’t massively widespread – though that figure should be 100%). There are also studies showing that this practice is potentially harmful over the long term:
“A significant portion of women report finding choking during sex pleasurable, with some studies indicating that as many as 41.1% of all participants in a study reported it being “very pleasurable”.
So, I’m not sure what to make of this – lots of people are doing it, are consenting to it and finding it enjoyable and, as much as I personally don’t think it’s a good idea, it’s up to people what they do with their sexual partners (assuming it is consensual).
I don’t think banning pornography depicting it is the way forward at all (unless you’re going to make the argument that porn encourages unhealthy sexual behaviour and this justifies banning it, in which case I think you would have to ban porn altogether if you’re taking that line of reasoning) but I do think raising awareness of how harmful it can be (even if it’s done “carefully”, without causing unconsciousness and with consent) would be a good idea.
I don’t think it’s a practice we should be encouraging, but I’m not sure that banning stuff is a particularly helpful strategy either.
Rob_Cram on
For somebody who dabbles more frequently than is obvious in this post in viewing and creating online content of this refined nature. I actually finds male actor’s behaviour, a massive turn off. That’s one of the main pet hates. I just can’t understand why they think they need to act like a f****** idiot. They all seem to do it like what the f*** makes an Individual feel like this is cool on camera.
So I’m glad of this ruling, it’s definitely needed. I’ve never watched stuff like that. But Jesus, I know, people often don’t want to see people making love, but there’s some middle ground and if I ever got into the industry of making films. There’s some ways to do stuff without looking like a f****** tool. So, yeah, fair play, but on the other hand if it’s role play. And if it’s consensual, that this is a bit like, stepping into censorship, a government censorship, and that’s not good.There’s a bit of a fine line, isn’t it.
Lost-Droids on
Instead of banning things (which wont work given the internet is global and any restriction is easily bypassed) we educate kids on whats right and wrong or acceptable and not.
jeremybeadleshand on
>It is already a criminal offence to possess porn depicting life-threatening acts, such as graphic strangulation.
Another new law for something already illegal then?
Additional_Pickle_59 on
I nominate myself to be part of the team to watch and see if it contains strangulation.
I would like my office to be a dark room and have a lock on the door
Thx
WeRW2020 on
My main porn viewing came when I was a teenager, roughly 2003-2008, and I can’t remember seeing a lot of violent material, most of it was quite vanilla. Not saying violent pornography didn’t exist, but you would have to really go and want to find the nasty stuff. It would probably be in the same category as BDSM.
On the rare occasion I look for porn today, it is noticeable how much more extreme the baseline is. On tube sites choking, spitting etc is front and centre rather than being a fringe interest. Not good, but I fear the genie is out the bottle.
I_am_legend-ary on
Utter nonsense.
I’m not into extreme porn, but trying to police what consenting adults watch is absurd.
Where does this policy stop? First face sitting now strangulation, next humiliation, spanking??????
We think a ban will stop children watching this content, it won’t and it never will, the internet will always find away
We need to address the issue in schools and homes, children need to be taught that what is seen online is not representative of the real word.
LordLucian on
Oh good because the one thing keeping me awake at night was worrying about the impact of strangulation pornography, Not climate change, the economy, potential world war 3 or the crime rate… nope not me.
Shoddy-Explorer-5285 on
People would seriously just cry about anything. “Banning isn’t effective” whatever, it’s still generally more effective than not banning anything ever at all
CertainPass105 on
Some people are into choking? Can we please stop banning things for no reason? It should not be a crime to be into kinky stuff as long as it’s consentual.
shark-with-a-horn on
I mean there has to be a limit right?
Strangulation can be accidentally fatal very easily and can cause medical issues even if not. There’s ethical issues around paying porn actresses to be strangled when they could die from it.
As a society we wouldn’t support stabbing somebody on camera and calling it porn just because some people would get off to it.
Forte69 on
But it’s fine to watch someone get strangled to death on a TV show.
Porn is acting, so what’s the difference?
Impossible_Aide_1681 on
200+ comments in under an hour during a work day. Who knew the right to tug your grubby little plonker to a woman being strangled was such an important philosophical issue?
Longjumping_Stand889 on
Porn discussions on this sub are quite entertaining because all the free speech warriors argue for censorship while the moral authoritarians want as few limits as they can get away with.
LakeNo3159 on
“Minister for victims and tackling VAWG Alex Davies-Jones said cracking down on extreme porn will send a clear message that ‘misogyny will not be tolerated’”
So if your partner asks you to choke them you should say no or you are being a bigot?
I’m not into that sort of thing anyway so I would say no regardless but it seems a weird thing for the Minister to say.
ohajik98 on
Strangulation or any form of asphyxiation play? Haven’t read the article
PaleShadowNight on
What about deepfake pornography of James May naked smothering his balls over Jeremy Clarksons body as they get lukewarm Bovril poured over both of them by Hammond?
Key-Performer810 on
No new content then , that’s a shame , will just watch the classics I guess.
SecTeff on
To make the case for this there needs to be a strong evidence base that watching this type of porn increases cases of non consensual violence.
Is there evidence for this?
You then need evidence a ban would be effectively enforced (difficult) and that it doesn’t create other harms such as pushing people off better regulated websites that check actors are consenting and if legal age towards more unregulated online spaces.
You then need to weigh up the harm from violence against the harm to people’s freedom of expression as a human right.
DandyBallbag on
It’s a violent pornography, choking chicks and sodomy. The kinda shit you get on your TV.
possible_sharknado on
Wish we could move on from the ‘video games make people violent’-type rhetoric already. Wish they’d start solving actual problems instead of busying themselves with puritanic virtue-signalling.
SecTeff on
Would this ban extend to literature where BDSM practices are widespread?
Seems we are living in a new age of censorship of sexual practices.
ultraboomkin on
BDSM is fun and enjoyable for a lot of people. TIL I’m a misogynist because my boyfriend likes being choked and I like doing it to him.
Zrker-1 on
Ah yes the fix to deep rooted societal issues is more bans. These actions are empty solutions leveraged to enable Politian’s to say “We are tackling the problem”.
homelaberator on
Porn does seem to be a special category of thing that can warrant a different approach to other content.
The big problem is that porn is still how a lot of people “learn” about sex. People seem generally oblivious to the risks not just of strangulation/asphyxiation but a range of other sexual practices since the only place they see sex is in porn, and there isn’t much content that shows how sex works in real life.
There’s also the reality that with the internet it’s far easier for children to stumble across content that they probably shouldn’t. We regulated film and TV to restrict certain content, so we will regulate online content in the same way. Not many people are complaining about the watershed or the existence of 15/18/R18 film/game classification as some horrible impost on adults.
People say that a ban like this can’t be enforced, but already the major porn platforms do geo-restrict certain content. That makes some difference. Yes, you will still find all the dodgy and illegal stuff out there if you look hard enough but when it’s off the major platforms it makes it harder to stumble across. It makes it generally less common.
The reality is that we have regulated media basically forever, and there probably is, on balance, some good in regulating what content is available for consumption. The kind of free for all that the early internet gave us couldn’t last and as we figure out how the new media landscape fits in with our broader culture, we’ll likely continue to regulate it.
Or maybe we just need some 70s style public education films showing the horror of sex strangling gone wrong, or the tragic effects of a2m etc.
MBOMaolRua on
Weird that they won’t go so far as to ban pornography depicting rape, but whatever I guess… Or maybe it’s already banned (as it should be) but it’s still all over t’internet. If that’s the case, then it seems any porn ban is moot anyway.
Suitable-Elephant189 on
Why not just ban all porn? Lots of women are actually into choking.
35 commenti
Oh good because that’ll stop the murderers from strangling people.
Creating a law banning something is easy. Enforcing the law and making the ban effective is a different matter entirely.
Sounds good but how are they going to enforce that exactly?
That’ll be incredibly hard to enforce given that what years ago would’ve been considered extreme content is now just a normal part of porn- I welcome it though honestly, people hate criticising what gets them off but constant access to extreme porn is fucking up peoples brains and attitude towards sex
As long as they don’t ban the system of a down song by mistake.
How exactly is this going to work? Is this basically a porn ban?
But real violence they won’t even bother to prosecute.
UK justice is now just a performative space for virtue signalling.
Enforce the existing laws before implementing unenforceable new ones.
Other than political virtue signalling, what does a ban actually achieve?
Anyone with an ounce of digital literacy knows how to use a VPN. Actually, you’d be kind of silly not to use a VPN these days.
Ok, so, firstly I want to say that there are absolutely issues with this kind of sexual practice – there are obviously non-consensual acts of choking during sex, which everyone should be able to agree is totally unacceptable (though a 2022 survey suggested that 92% of people reporting sexual choking said it was consensual so, it isn’t massively widespread – though that figure should be 100%). There are also studies showing that this practice is potentially harmful over the long term:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10294564/
That being said research has shown that
“A significant portion of women report finding choking during sex pleasurable, with some studies indicating that as many as 41.1% of all participants in a study reported it being “very pleasurable”.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9333342/
So, I’m not sure what to make of this – lots of people are doing it, are consenting to it and finding it enjoyable and, as much as I personally don’t think it’s a good idea, it’s up to people what they do with their sexual partners (assuming it is consensual).
I don’t think banning pornography depicting it is the way forward at all (unless you’re going to make the argument that porn encourages unhealthy sexual behaviour and this justifies banning it, in which case I think you would have to ban porn altogether if you’re taking that line of reasoning) but I do think raising awareness of how harmful it can be (even if it’s done “carefully”, without causing unconsciousness and with consent) would be a good idea.
I don’t think it’s a practice we should be encouraging, but I’m not sure that banning stuff is a particularly helpful strategy either.
For somebody who dabbles more frequently than is obvious in this post in viewing and creating online content of this refined nature. I actually finds male actor’s behaviour, a massive turn off. That’s one of the main pet hates. I just can’t understand why they think they need to act like a f****** idiot. They all seem to do it like what the f*** makes an Individual feel like this is cool on camera.
So I’m glad of this ruling, it’s definitely needed. I’ve never watched stuff like that. But Jesus, I know, people often don’t want to see people making love, but there’s some middle ground and if I ever got into the industry of making films. There’s some ways to do stuff without looking like a f****** tool. So, yeah, fair play, but on the other hand if it’s role play. And if it’s consensual, that this is a bit like, stepping into censorship, a government censorship, and that’s not good.There’s a bit of a fine line, isn’t it.
Instead of banning things (which wont work given the internet is global and any restriction is easily bypassed) we educate kids on whats right and wrong or acceptable and not.
>It is already a criminal offence to possess porn depicting life-threatening acts, such as graphic strangulation.
Another new law for something already illegal then?
I nominate myself to be part of the team to watch and see if it contains strangulation.
I would like my office to be a dark room and have a lock on the door
Thx
My main porn viewing came when I was a teenager, roughly 2003-2008, and I can’t remember seeing a lot of violent material, most of it was quite vanilla. Not saying violent pornography didn’t exist, but you would have to really go and want to find the nasty stuff. It would probably be in the same category as BDSM.
On the rare occasion I look for porn today, it is noticeable how much more extreme the baseline is. On tube sites choking, spitting etc is front and centre rather than being a fringe interest. Not good, but I fear the genie is out the bottle.
Utter nonsense.
I’m not into extreme porn, but trying to police what consenting adults watch is absurd.
Where does this policy stop? First face sitting now strangulation, next humiliation, spanking??????
We think a ban will stop children watching this content, it won’t and it never will, the internet will always find away
We need to address the issue in schools and homes, children need to be taught that what is seen online is not representative of the real word.
Oh good because the one thing keeping me awake at night was worrying about the impact of strangulation pornography, Not climate change, the economy, potential world war 3 or the crime rate… nope not me.
People would seriously just cry about anything. “Banning isn’t effective” whatever, it’s still generally more effective than not banning anything ever at all
Some people are into choking? Can we please stop banning things for no reason? It should not be a crime to be into kinky stuff as long as it’s consentual.
I mean there has to be a limit right?
Strangulation can be accidentally fatal very easily and can cause medical issues even if not. There’s ethical issues around paying porn actresses to be strangled when they could die from it.
As a society we wouldn’t support stabbing somebody on camera and calling it porn just because some people would get off to it.
But it’s fine to watch someone get strangled to death on a TV show.
Porn is acting, so what’s the difference?
200+ comments in under an hour during a work day. Who knew the right to tug your grubby little plonker to a woman being strangled was such an important philosophical issue?
Porn discussions on this sub are quite entertaining because all the free speech warriors argue for censorship while the moral authoritarians want as few limits as they can get away with.
“Minister for victims and tackling VAWG Alex Davies-Jones said cracking down on extreme porn will send a clear message that ‘misogyny will not be tolerated’”
So if your partner asks you to choke them you should say no or you are being a bigot?
I’m not into that sort of thing anyway so I would say no regardless but it seems a weird thing for the Minister to say.
Strangulation or any form of asphyxiation play? Haven’t read the article
What about deepfake pornography of James May naked smothering his balls over Jeremy Clarksons body as they get lukewarm Bovril poured over both of them by Hammond?
No new content then , that’s a shame , will just watch the classics I guess.
To make the case for this there needs to be a strong evidence base that watching this type of porn increases cases of non consensual violence.
Is there evidence for this?
You then need evidence a ban would be effectively enforced (difficult) and that it doesn’t create other harms such as pushing people off better regulated websites that check actors are consenting and if legal age towards more unregulated online spaces.
You then need to weigh up the harm from violence against the harm to people’s freedom of expression as a human right.
It’s a violent pornography, choking chicks and sodomy. The kinda shit you get on your TV.
Wish we could move on from the ‘video games make people violent’-type rhetoric already. Wish they’d start solving actual problems instead of busying themselves with puritanic virtue-signalling.
Would this ban extend to literature where BDSM practices are widespread?
Seems we are living in a new age of censorship of sexual practices.
BDSM is fun and enjoyable for a lot of people. TIL I’m a misogynist because my boyfriend likes being choked and I like doing it to him.
Ah yes the fix to deep rooted societal issues is more bans. These actions are empty solutions leveraged to enable Politian’s to say “We are tackling the problem”.
Porn does seem to be a special category of thing that can warrant a different approach to other content.
The big problem is that porn is still how a lot of people “learn” about sex. People seem generally oblivious to the risks not just of strangulation/asphyxiation but a range of other sexual practices since the only place they see sex is in porn, and there isn’t much content that shows how sex works in real life.
There’s also the reality that with the internet it’s far easier for children to stumble across content that they probably shouldn’t. We regulated film and TV to restrict certain content, so we will regulate online content in the same way. Not many people are complaining about the watershed or the existence of 15/18/R18 film/game classification as some horrible impost on adults.
People say that a ban like this can’t be enforced, but already the major porn platforms do geo-restrict certain content. That makes some difference. Yes, you will still find all the dodgy and illegal stuff out there if you look hard enough but when it’s off the major platforms it makes it harder to stumble across. It makes it generally less common.
The reality is that we have regulated media basically forever, and there probably is, on balance, some good in regulating what content is available for consumption. The kind of free for all that the early internet gave us couldn’t last and as we figure out how the new media landscape fits in with our broader culture, we’ll likely continue to regulate it.
Or maybe we just need some 70s style public education films showing the horror of sex strangling gone wrong, or the tragic effects of a2m etc.
Weird that they won’t go so far as to ban pornography depicting rape, but whatever I guess… Or maybe it’s already banned (as it should be) but it’s still all over t’internet. If that’s the case, then it seems any porn ban is moot anyway.
Why not just ban all porn? Lots of women are actually into choking.