Share.

    2 commenti

    1. DukePPUk on

      I feel like him being “shocked and frustrated” is on him, rather than on the protesters.

      Rightly or wrongly, Palestine Action is viewed more or as a protest group, rather than a bunch of terrorists. They’re mostly known for splashing red paint on things. Which is criminal damage, but I think it is a bit of a stretch to claim anything they’ve done (and they’ve done quite a bit) amounts to “serious damage to property,” “serious violence against a person,” or “creates a serious risk to the health or safety of the public.”

      When the RAF Brize Norton break-in happened it was all over the news as sabotage – people were talking about it being treason, or acts of a hostile foreign power. But it turned out to be two activists spraying red paint on a couple of planes. Keir Starmer referred to it as an “act of vandalism,” and Downing Street said it hadn’t affected any deployments or operations.

      It feels like proscribing them as a terrorist organisation is more about cover up the embarrassment of two random activists being able to get into an RAF base and spray paint planes than a proportionate response. And definitely isn’t a good look when in the past there is proof the Israeli embassy pressured the Government into interfering with cases involving Palestine Action…

    2. Chillmm8 on

      This honestly comes across as people who know this is dancing on the lines of legality and are hoping for a heavy handed police response. Playing the victim and oppression card is all they’ve got left.

      Best case scenario is minimal arrests before legislation is passed and repeating the event is considered a deliberate criminal act. However I’m not seeing this going down peacefully.

    Leave A Reply