There are a few reasons that this is an awful decision. I strongly believe that the UK needs to reintroduce an air delivered nuclear weapon, but;
1. Using American B-61s through NATO nuclear sharing adds absolutely nothing of value to the alliance; a complete waste of our time and money.
2. Making F-35A the delivery platform is moronic considering the RAFs tanker fleet cannot refuel them.
3. Buying 12 jets introduces all the problems of a new type in service to put pressure on the spares pipelines and so on whilst being far too low a number to be operationally useful.
A thoroughly idiotic decision all round.
plusminusatenth on
they need to purchase a goverment that stops illegals and beats the fuck out of the people raping women. just a thought.
Potential-South-2807 on
The RAF should be banned from making procurement decisions. Why do they always do the dumbest possible thing in any moment?
No_Regret_9475 on
Starmer just can’t do something right
TheoryOfDevolution on
Aren’t the F-35A meant to replace the RAF Tornado? If so, 12 is more than sufficient to maintain Britain’s gravity nuclear delivery capability.
EnergyOwn6800 on
Smart decision.
MundaneImprovement27 on
Insane to buy Amagarican, given their kill switches, let alone funding a fascist state
Dry-Swim228 on
Guess they’re really committing to that ‘keep calm and carry on’ spirit
hmtk1976 on
This feels like a purchase to appease Trump.
Nuclear gravity bombs are relatively simple tech. The UK should be perfectly capable to develop its own rather than depend on US bombs. The actual usefulness of those weapons seems questionable at best as well if you have a bunch of Tridents sneaking around at sea.
If the UK wants nukes to be delivered by the RAF, why not use a stand-off weapon like French do ?
United_Success_6548 on
There goes the 5% NATO commitment.
trollsmurf on
If any “side” would use nuclear weapons it will be devastation, so I don’t see any use of wasting time on it. Much more important: cyber warfare, light modern automated weapons, economic and resource independence.
bad-mean-daddy on
This is a two fold exercise
Tempest which is a design that is large enough to carry a nuclear payload won’t be ready for the next decade and a half (minimum)
Starmer is also trying to keep Trump sweet and showing him that the uk is still buying American gear
Keeps the trade agreement on track and frankly he’s chosen the bare minimum to show willing, as far as number of jets is concerned
turbo_gh0st on
F-16s are nuclear capable lol so are many old ass airframes.
13 commenti
There are a few reasons that this is an awful decision. I strongly believe that the UK needs to reintroduce an air delivered nuclear weapon, but;
1. Using American B-61s through NATO nuclear sharing adds absolutely nothing of value to the alliance; a complete waste of our time and money.
2. Making F-35A the delivery platform is moronic considering the RAFs tanker fleet cannot refuel them.
3. Buying 12 jets introduces all the problems of a new type in service to put pressure on the spares pipelines and so on whilst being far too low a number to be operationally useful.
A thoroughly idiotic decision all round.
they need to purchase a goverment that stops illegals and beats the fuck out of the people raping women. just a thought.
The RAF should be banned from making procurement decisions. Why do they always do the dumbest possible thing in any moment?
Starmer just can’t do something right
Aren’t the F-35A meant to replace the RAF Tornado? If so, 12 is more than sufficient to maintain Britain’s gravity nuclear delivery capability.
Smart decision.
Insane to buy Amagarican, given their kill switches, let alone funding a fascist state
Guess they’re really committing to that ‘keep calm and carry on’ spirit
This feels like a purchase to appease Trump.
Nuclear gravity bombs are relatively simple tech. The UK should be perfectly capable to develop its own rather than depend on US bombs. The actual usefulness of those weapons seems questionable at best as well if you have a bunch of Tridents sneaking around at sea.
If the UK wants nukes to be delivered by the RAF, why not use a stand-off weapon like French do ?
There goes the 5% NATO commitment.
If any “side” would use nuclear weapons it will be devastation, so I don’t see any use of wasting time on it. Much more important: cyber warfare, light modern automated weapons, economic and resource independence.
This is a two fold exercise
Tempest which is a design that is large enough to carry a nuclear payload won’t be ready for the next decade and a half (minimum)
Starmer is also trying to keep Trump sweet and showing him that the uk is still buying American gear
Keeps the trade agreement on track and frankly he’s chosen the bare minimum to show willing, as far as number of jets is concerned
F-16s are nuclear capable lol so are many old ass airframes.