Share.

    8 commenti

    1. ScaldyBogBalls on

      These homes were basic, most didn’t even have indoor plumbing when they were built. Yet, over many generations they’ve made happy homes as people put in the amenities they needed. Now they’re among the most desirable homes in the city, some going for over 600K despite their tiny size.

      Oh but we’ve made them illegal to build nowadays, oh well. “Four walls, windows, doors and a roof? Are you mad?”

    2. genericusername5763 on

      This kind of development is a large part of why we’re in the mess we’re in

      There was/is a deliberate anti-urban policy. A certain part of the conservative mindset is that cities are “evil” and the cause of sin and vice.

      Reality is that a certain density means that people can easily walk to shops/services, and that there’s enough customers nearby to support those services. Public transport becomes much more viable and easier to access.

      They built these houses because if fit their moral ideals, then little though was put into transport or other services because the leaders didn’t actually give a damn about the people

    3. 21stCenturyVole on

      The state is able to train/employ anyone to directly build homes, provide those workers with those homes, paid off through building more homes.

      Any person willing to contribute to building homes or to the supply chain, should not be homeless or out of a job.

      It’s a purely political choice to deliberately make people homeless, to maximize profits.

      The state is at war with the people it is making homeless.

    4. Im not one to defend FFFG but throwing up a 1930s house which would have a BER of fuckin Y or something, doesn’t compare to building an A3 rated modern house, not even the same ballpark

    Leave A Reply