Share.

    8 commenti

    1. kraswotar on

      So. Here is the problematic part. Disrespecting religious values is illegal in the country. No matter which religion it is. Of course, it’s enforced in a biased manner. But in an ideal scenario, you’d approach religion with respect. I do agree that mocking religion, especially in media should be punished. BUT. In this case, it wasn’t just an arrest. The cartoonist was stoned and beaten. And the people who did that saw no punishment. There is no justification for that.

    2. Mentality from the Dark ages, must not allow them to develop their critical thinking.

    3. KeyGateGuardian on

      Every country has the right to set their own laws, no matter how those laws may be seen by other countries.

      If everything in the article is according to Turkey’s laws, then there’s no discussion to be had. If things are not according to their laws… well, it’s still something that they need to deal with.

      What does bother me is that in a lot of places that aren’t Turkey, people are afraid to express their right to free speech, protected by the laws of those countries, which does include religious caricatures including caricatures of Muhammad. Be they respectful of not.
      And everyone is behaving like that’s normal.

    4. calm_as_possible on

      Caricature was not even about the prophet btw. Armenian journalist Hrant Dink falsely accused and eventually killed to promote nationalist upheaval in Turkey, now this one is the Islamist version of it.

    5. Betonkauwer on

      Wow thats crazy theyre becoming a lot like the British nanny state.

    6. ShitassAintOverYet on

      The fun thing is that this wasn’t a Charlie Hebdo case, they didn’t picture Prophet Muhammad but some Arabic dude named Muhammad.

      The message was also promoting peace but the fuck do Islamists know about that?

    7. Personal-Special-286 on

      I mean try making caricatures of the holocaust in Germany and you would be arrested just as quickly. 

    Leave A Reply