Share.

    18 commenti

    1. Ok_Magazine_3383 on

      >Ms Hand’s counsel John Gordon said his side was in “shock” at the late withdrawal of the fresh evidence application.

      >He said Ms Hand had been “put through the ringer” after the allegation, which she denounced as “lies”, were outlined in court and reported in the newspapers.

      >Mr Gordon said he should be allowed to bring the matter to the attention of the DPP for potential perjury, as well as subornation of perjury by McGregor.

      >The presiding judge, Ms Justice Isobel Kennedy, said the court would allow the withdrawal of the ground.

      >Mr Gordon asked if McGregor’s side would apologise to Ms Hand. Mr Mulholland responded that this was “something we can deal with” through McGregor’s solicitor Michael Staines “in due course”.

      https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/claim-nikita-hand-was-assaulted-by-ex-partner-dramatically-dropped-by-conor-mcgregor/a347461589.html

    2. Ok-Cranberry3761 on

      In the interest of fairness and justice to take place, and additionally for justice to be explicity seen to take place, it should be referred to DPP for perjury

    3. Hard to really know what to make of this and what those “futher admission were” that was recieved yesterday.

      I can only guess it relates to the claims of the neighbours.

    4. locksymania on

      The rule of thumb is that anything McGregor does, it’s a safe bet he’ll do it in the shittiest way imaginable.

    5. Plastic_Detective687 on

      > Ms Hand denies that her former boyfriend ever assaulted her and said she did not want to speculate about why Samantha and Stephen were making up lies.

      > Lawyers for Mr McGregor told the court this morning, they wanted to withdraw this application to bring the evidence of Ms O’Reilly and Mr Cummins.

      Can Ms. Hand’s lawyer request these cunts bank accounts be checked?

    6. RemnantOfSpotOn on

      God knows what he did over the weekend to realise yeah court was right

    7. SirMike_MT on

      The self proclaimed ‘paytriots’ will still lick arse as if he’s their saviour!

    8. > Conor McGregor’s lawyers are arguing that he had a right to silence in garda interviews and a right not to incriminate himself

      Ladies and gentlemen we gottem

    9. YmpetreDreamer on

      It might seem like his appeal is a complete mess. But the point isn’t to win (obviously if he can win, that’s a bonus for him). The point is to punish her for taking a case in the first place and make the whole thing as arduous and difficult as possible. Revenge, and a warning to others who would take a case, and muddying the waters and casting doubt so his supporters have some excuse to pretend to believe him.

    10. funglegunk on

      It’s a real shame that arguably the most famous Irish person in the world is such a piece of shit.

    11. Difficult-Set-3151 on

      Honestly, all the evidence they claimed they wanted introduced would have swayed me into thinking he had a defence.

      But withdrawing it now makes me think it never existed or not to the extent his lawyers claimed.

    12. pablo8itall on

      So like everything that shits out of that man, lies, smoke, bollox and sham.

      I wont shed a tear when your heart explodes from the coke.

    13. Haleakala1998 on

      If I was convicted of a rape I claimed I didn’t commit, I wouldn’t be withdrawing any appeals…

    14. lkdubdub on

      This man is simply unspeakable. He must be one of the worst people currently wasting oxygen on the planet.

      “Mr Gordon indicated there might be an issue about referring matters to the Director of Public Prosecutions for consideration of perjury proceedings.”

      Fingers crossed 

    Leave A Reply