this kind of stuff , if made affordable enough ,would sell like hotcakes in Southern Europe, and could be installed on historic buildings as well without ruining the view and architectural style
a further step would be solar tiles , like the ones made by this German company
Looks tacky. There’s plenty of fields, leave the castles looking like castles
Dot-Slash-Dot on
I mean this is nice, but we have vastly more than enough space for PV. What we need is more of them, not necessarily nicer looking ones.
Aggravating-War-6213 on
Even middleagers are more advanced than altright
niels719 on
Looks sharp. I work in pv so while I like it I also feel a bit worries about putting it on monuments. Hope that the contractor didn’t mess up anything with the connectors.
Noctew on
**Good. I hope other states follow suit, and that local communities won’t have the power to veto this. Historic preservation in Germany has gone completely overboard.**
I understand the desire to preserve certain unique buildings in their original state or to maintain the overall aesthetic of historic districts—so we don’t end up with a neon-pink façade facing a centuries-old marketplace. But things have gone too far when *any* building becomes protected simply because it hasn’t been demolished quickly enough, regardless of whether it holds genuine historical value.
Worse still is when any change to a building is banned, turning it into a financial black hole for its owner.
“No, you can’t install double-glazed windows—you might be able to tell they’re not the originals from 1770! Insulation? Absolutely not. And solar panels? Forget it—they didn’t have those in 1770! Also, don’t even think about changing the color of the window frames!”
nof on
This blows away my landlord’s insistence that the balcony PV panels will disrupt the architectural beauty of this vintage 1972 beige apartment block I live in.
8 commenti
this kind of stuff , if made affordable enough ,would sell like hotcakes in Southern Europe, and could be installed on historic buildings as well without ruining the view and architectural style
a further step would be solar tiles , like the ones made by this German company
[https://www.jacobi-tiles.com/products/solarsolutions/solar-rooftile/](https://www.jacobi-tiles.com/products/solarsolutions/solar-rooftile/)
making them curved would be even better
Looks tacky. There’s plenty of fields, leave the castles looking like castles
I mean this is nice, but we have vastly more than enough space for PV. What we need is more of them, not necessarily nicer looking ones.
Even middleagers are more advanced than altright
Looks sharp. I work in pv so while I like it I also feel a bit worries about putting it on monuments. Hope that the contractor didn’t mess up anything with the connectors.
**Good. I hope other states follow suit, and that local communities won’t have the power to veto this. Historic preservation in Germany has gone completely overboard.**
I understand the desire to preserve certain unique buildings in their original state or to maintain the overall aesthetic of historic districts—so we don’t end up with a neon-pink façade facing a centuries-old marketplace. But things have gone too far when *any* building becomes protected simply because it hasn’t been demolished quickly enough, regardless of whether it holds genuine historical value.
Worse still is when any change to a building is banned, turning it into a financial black hole for its owner.
“No, you can’t install double-glazed windows—you might be able to tell they’re not the originals from 1770! Insulation? Absolutely not. And solar panels? Forget it—they didn’t have those in 1770! Also, don’t even think about changing the color of the window frames!”
This blows away my landlord’s insistence that the balcony PV panels will disrupt the architectural beauty of this vintage 1972 beige apartment block I live in.
Absolutely disgusting.