Share.

    10 commenti

    1. Loose-Stand-3889 on

      This isn’t surprising at all, it would actually be surprising if this wasn’t the case

    2. ThePortableSCRPN on

      Rrrrright. So the origin can be traced back further than the foot of the Ural mountains. That’s not THAT surprising.

    3. Malgus20033 on

      Breaking news: a member of the Uralic language family, which stretches east and west of the Urals, may in fact have origins east of the Urals! 
      Next: Galatians may be related to Gauls, Turks and Turkmen might have common ancestors, English might have origins in Anglia, and Slovak and Slovenian might be Slavic.

      This aside, the article is not as useless at the title implies, as it claims Finns, Estonians, and co have origins in Siberia, not just Hungarians, which would mean their origin is not where we first assumed it was. It also means we have even less idea who is native to Northern Europe 😀

    4. andrasq420 on

      The only surprising development around our language would be if it turned out that it is originally from any continent other than Asia.

    5. TheBusStop12 on

      I thought it was common knowledge that Hungarian was a Finno-Ugric language, completely seperate from the other Indo-European languages of Europe, except Finnish and Estonian and that it traces it’s roots back to the Urals and Siberia

    Leave A Reply