I can’t wait for this to be a baffling story we tell our grandkids.
“Yeah, little Jimmy, our government actually housed hundreds of thousands of fake asylum seekers in hotels and made us pay for it and did everything they could to keep it as suspicious as possible”
Bigbawls009 on
How is it the big 2025 and we still have refugees deport
Express-Doughnut-562 on
I sorta get the governments perspective on this. More than anything, we want these firms to do proper checks and control of their employees, you know, like a proper business. Just letting them block people who fire up their app at a hotel and saying ‘right, job done’ isn’t really that.
Because they’ll just fire up the app somewhere outside the hotel.
ICutDownTrees on
I wonder why they would be reluctant to share the location? It wouldn’t be because a bunch of knuckle dragging idiots want to set them on fire?
Imaginary_Sir_3333 on
All under the guise of protecting human rights. It’s disgusting.
There are genuine refugees that is a accepted fact, and we should help. Having said that, there are other countries that take them. I dont have figures or their policies on doing so.
All I know is there are thousands of people coming into this country illegally and are then being treated as if they have just got off flight 686, with legitimate paperwork. Its not desperation from a war-torn country. it’s because it is so relatively easy to do so. There is risk, but they know no legal consequences will befall them. The reward is plentiful.
place to live, clothes, food…..then off out in the evening to do some cash in hand.
Not even people who are homeless or have lost a home due to a financial loss or a break up. In a hostel you go , everything shared, kids or no kids. (I know someone who was treated this way and may not happen in every case).
PartyPoison98 on
Why should the Home Office have to share their confidential data with private firms?
This is a non-issue, side stepping the real problem. If delivery firms wanted to totally avoid hiring asylum seekers, they could treat their workers like actual employees and perform right to work checks like every other business in the country.
Instead, they make a request they know will get rejected, and just get to shrug and go “oh well, guess the refugees will have to keep taking our piss poor payments for delivery”.
6 commenti
I can’t wait for this to be a baffling story we tell our grandkids.
“Yeah, little Jimmy, our government actually housed hundreds of thousands of fake asylum seekers in hotels and made us pay for it and did everything they could to keep it as suspicious as possible”
How is it the big 2025 and we still have refugees deport
I sorta get the governments perspective on this. More than anything, we want these firms to do proper checks and control of their employees, you know, like a proper business. Just letting them block people who fire up their app at a hotel and saying ‘right, job done’ isn’t really that.
Because they’ll just fire up the app somewhere outside the hotel.
I wonder why they would be reluctant to share the location? It wouldn’t be because a bunch of knuckle dragging idiots want to set them on fire?
All under the guise of protecting human rights. It’s disgusting.
There are genuine refugees that is a accepted fact, and we should help. Having said that, there are other countries that take them. I dont have figures or their policies on doing so.
All I know is there are thousands of people coming into this country illegally and are then being treated as if they have just got off flight 686, with legitimate paperwork. Its not desperation from a war-torn country. it’s because it is so relatively easy to do so. There is risk, but they know no legal consequences will befall them. The reward is plentiful.
place to live, clothes, food…..then off out in the evening to do some cash in hand.
Not even people who are homeless or have lost a home due to a financial loss or a break up. In a hostel you go , everything shared, kids or no kids. (I know someone who was treated this way and may not happen in every case).
Why should the Home Office have to share their confidential data with private firms?
This is a non-issue, side stepping the real problem. If delivery firms wanted to totally avoid hiring asylum seekers, they could treat their workers like actual employees and perform right to work checks like every other business in the country.
Instead, they make a request they know will get rejected, and just get to shrug and go “oh well, guess the refugees will have to keep taking our piss poor payments for delivery”.