Questo caso è un eccellente esempio degli attuali problemi con la legge sulla pianificazione irlandese. Un famoso pub in Parliament Street deve passare attraverso 3 anni di contenzioso perché una persona si è trasferita in un appartamento nelle vicinanze e ha iniziato a fare lamentele. 3 anni di contenzioso e denaro speso per avvocati in seguito la corte finalmente vede senso che se ti trasferisci in un’area famosa per la sua vita notturna ci sarà rumore 🤦♂️
https://i.redd.it/wn93drygmadf1.png
di nitro1234561
12 commenti
[Source](https://www.instagram.com/stories/street66dublin/3678200151168915155?utm_source=ig_story_item_share&igsh=aHY2N2Z0NTU1eXFu) is Street 66’s Instagram story
I hope they can claim for costs, and I hope the flat owners never have a good nights sleep again.
Between this and the council not granting them planning permission for outdoor seating and instead putting in a bike rack, they’ve really been having a tough time the last few years. Delighted they’ve got the win on this one!
This shit has killed nightlife in London. When I lived there over ten years ago Soho was buzzing every night of the week, now everywhere is closed after 12.
Don’t live in an area famous for its nightlife if you don’t want noise.
I remember all the people started moving to the countryside and complaining about the smell! Whoever was over the farmers at the time had to go on R.T.E. and tell people to stop complaining just cos u moved from the city!
If it’s a quiet night of sleep you enjoy (as I do), the rule of thumb of “don’t buy an apartment in Temple Bar” is one that most would file under The Bleedin’ Obvious.
I know people in Edinburgh who moved above a bar and complained so much that the bar had to reduce it’s opening hours and halt live music and karaoke.
It was a complete shit hole mind you, but they knew what it was before they moved. People upstairs in a bar I worked on complained all time about noise, even when there was very little going on.
If you don’t want any noise. Don’t buy a property above, or close to a bar.
I feel like the underlying issue isn’t being mentioned here: if there were enough flats available elsewhere, I doubt this person would’ve moved into the place above this pub.
I’d say this is a supply and demand issue, not a zoning issue.
I lived in a new build estate near the airport. Locals immediately began looking for ways to begin objecting to the second runway. They also started objecting to new developments in the area (already in the council master plan.)
People are just self interested wankers.
Bigger issue with cases like this is solicitors taking them on a no win, no fee basis. Solicitors are given a free ride whenever bewildering cases of litigation are discussed.
If individuals had the risk of having to actually pay the price for a defeated case they brought, a large portion would think twice.
Aye, folk buying gaffs along the railway line and complaining about train noise. Gobshites.
This is rampant – O’Donoghue’s owner bought the apartments behind Toners Garden with the sole purpose of using them to do the same. Allegedly.
SOURCE: Was definitely not a barrister in that area if practice at the time