I don’t normally post on these telegraph headlines but i have been trying to view left and right wing viewpoints on the migration / law and order issues and whats clear to me is there has been a serious breakdown in law and order.
The first and foremost job of any government is to keep its citizens safe. If you dont believe me its exactly what the home office sets out on their webpage [https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/home-office](https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/home-office)
This contract is obviously broken here and it does not appear that the Govt are intending on fixing it.
We cannot proceed as a nation if this basic fundamental is not fixed and that needs to be looked at through the policing, courts, laws and prison system ASAP.
Wanallo221 on
> It means he is no longer excluded from the UK and can return as long as he secures permission from the Home Office.
Non-story. His formal ban order is removed because a ban order only can remain in place for the duration of a theoretical sentence. However he does not have the right to return to the U.K. still. Because the home office have the final say over him being allowed to come back, and they have said they will not allow him to return.
I understand the issue with migration. But honestly the Daily Telegraph is such an abhorrent shitrag that does nothing but stir up anger and shit. They can’t even report the actual news properly.
DukePPUk on
Telegraph lying with their headline, as usual:
> Revoking the deportation order means that Mr Umoh is no longer excluded from entering the UK by operation of law. The revocation does not itself give permission for Mr Umoh to enter the UK or remain in the UK.
10+ years ago the Home Office banned him from the country. The Tribunal said that ban is no longer enforceable due to how long ago it was.
But that doesn’t mean he can come into the country, it just means that if he applies to come into the country the Home Office needs some other rule to exclude him – like him being a foreign criminal.
3 commenti
I don’t normally post on these telegraph headlines but i have been trying to view left and right wing viewpoints on the migration / law and order issues and whats clear to me is there has been a serious breakdown in law and order.
The first and foremost job of any government is to keep its citizens safe. If you dont believe me its exactly what the home office sets out on their webpage [https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/home-office](https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/home-office)
This contract is obviously broken here and it does not appear that the Govt are intending on fixing it.
We cannot proceed as a nation if this basic fundamental is not fixed and that needs to be looked at through the policing, courts, laws and prison system ASAP.
> It means he is no longer excluded from the UK and can return as long as he secures permission from the Home Office.
Non-story. His formal ban order is removed because a ban order only can remain in place for the duration of a theoretical sentence. However he does not have the right to return to the U.K. still. Because the home office have the final say over him being allowed to come back, and they have said they will not allow him to return.
I understand the issue with migration. But honestly the Daily Telegraph is such an abhorrent shitrag that does nothing but stir up anger and shit. They can’t even report the actual news properly.
Telegraph lying with their headline, as usual:
> Revoking the deportation order means that Mr Umoh is no longer excluded from entering the UK by operation of law. The revocation does not itself give permission for Mr Umoh to enter the UK or remain in the UK.
10+ years ago the Home Office banned him from the country. The Tribunal said that ban is no longer enforceable due to how long ago it was.
But that doesn’t mean he can come into the country, it just means that if he applies to come into the country the Home Office needs some other rule to exclude him – like him being a foreign criminal.