Lucy Connolly sarà ospite d’onore in parlamento dopo il rilascio anticipato dal carcere per Southport Social Media Post

    https://www.gbnews.com/politics/lucy-connolly-parliament-early-release-prison-southport-social-media-post

    di The-Peel

    Share.

    26 commenti

    1. The-Peel on

      >Just days ago, The Sun revealed that she will be released early after serving 40 per cent of her term.
      And now, she has been invited to attend a Westminster debate on a landmark petition to review the possible penalties for social media posts.

      Enough to make you puke.

    2. Daygl0wfires on

      Sick of hearing about this cow lol right wingers love her don’t they I don’t see the appeal.

    3. South-Stand on

      ‘A political prisoner’, my arse. What a disgrace. Tice wants to make explicit racism ok.

    4. Generic-Name03 on

      So I guess it’s okay to advocate for burning people alive now then.

    5. RubberDuckyRapidsBro on

      I know she wont ever really be hard for money but say if she was a normal person with a 9-5, would having gone jail affect her future career prospects DBS wise?

    6. Less-Guest6036 on

      ‘Guest of honour’ is doing some real heavy lifting there.

      She’s been invited by a Reform MP to attend a debate not scheduled yet, and it’s hardly a ‘landmark petition’.

    7. AFulhamImmigrant on

      She is the perfect example of how free speech is alive in Britain today.

      She made a Tweet, it went viral. Everyone knows what she thinks.

      There were consequences for said Tweet.

      Can somebody explain what I am missing?

    8. AngryGardenGnomes on

      She served her time, and is clearly the most relevant person to attend the debate on this topic (penalties for social media posts). So I don’t see the issue.

    9. OldLondon on

      Or – Reform MP invites her to a debate that has no date and says she will be a guest of honour.

    10. ContributionIll5741 on

      New mouthpiece for the far right. Wonder if she’ll take Yaxley Lennon’s place now he’s fled the country.

    11. Jmielnik2002 on

      ‘Women who admitted to committing a crime guest of honor to MP’ doesn’t sound as good to the cause I guess

    12. _DoogieLion on

      Didn’t even have to read the article and knew it would be a reform MP inviting this terrorist into Parliament.

      Who else would think it’s acceptable to invite someone into parliament who admitted encouraging people to try and burn down hotels with men, women and children inside.

    13. HyperionSaber on

      Yeah I bet the debate will be greatly enhanced by the addition of this gutless racist prick with a chip on her shoulder and faridges coprophage halitosis on the back of her neck.

    14. Defiant-Plenty6502 on

      She comes across as a nasty individual

      I am sure she will use her ‘ordeal’ to her advantage. She will have a show on GB News.

    15. 9500140351 on

      ???? Why on earth is parliament inviting a woman that tweeted hotels full of migrants should be burned down and she doesn’t care if they’re inside (inciting/implying murder)

      WHAT

    16. AnalThermometer on

      Her sentence does seem politically motivated. Why? There’s enough evidence to say the courts used her, and some others, for exemplary deterrence to quell the unrest the government was in panic about. She did not get a sentence in proportion to her pleading guilty, having a family, and having a clean criminal record which would normally mean a suspended sentence. Like the upstanding guy at the riots who got a suspended sentence for throwing a brick at police the other day, among loads of other examples of worse crimes being suspended via plea deals.

    17. Jmielnik2002 on

      One of the biggest shifts we need to make as a society is more acknowledgement that the internet , and social media is not juts some silly thing people take part in.

      If you are going to put your face on it, use your real name and tweet opinions or anything – then it holds as much validity as saying it in a room full of people.

      Just because someone tweeted it does not take remove any seriousness or content of what you said, acting as because it was said online in this day in age is just sheer stupidity

    18. weirdhoney216 on

      Excuse me why do we need this racist pos in parliament?

    19. cinematic_novel on

      She should have been sternly warned not to do that again (she deleted the post after 3.5 h). Non custodial sentence would have been a harsh punishment, home detention the upper limit of what would have been proportionate.

    20. Break-n-Dish on

      I think we have to praise the far right for their inclusivity here. Fat ugly racists used to mostly just be men 👏

    21. I thought the whole reason Trump was visiting during recess was because Parliament *doesn’t* allow violent racists.

    22. urbanspaceman85 on

      Should have locked her up for good. Vile, evil woman.

    23. ComradeDelter on

      All the “free speech absolutists” in the comments here, I thought it was pretty simple lmao. Should you be free to shout fire in a crowded theatre? Should people be free to claim you’re a pedophile or a murderer? The sentence was possibly a little harsh but inciting violence and racial hatred in the way she did in her tweet is absolutely punishable, it’s a lot more than a “mean tweet”

      These days if you say you’re English…

    24. Past_Humor8321 on

      Wow. Far Right now support terror loving people who want to burn people alive. Wow. It is mind boggling that evil 👿 is now a good thing in the UK. Wow.

    25. Loose_Teach7299 on

      This lady encouraged people to set fire to a building. Just fyi

    Leave A Reply