Share.

    10 commenti

    1. xxxRedditPolicexxx on

      This reminds me of the ‘tactics’ that are used by teachers who are pressure to meet government targets on things like grades attainment and attendance – like theme park trips for those with 100% attendance meaning that a pupil who might have been off ill one day might be effectively penalised for being ill, or plying pupils with sweets and chocolate in order to meet some target. I understand the need for monitoring of the quality of teaching but it seems to result in some incentives getting a bit out of hand.

    2. tempy1256 on

      Aye I bet that was the unlucky first time she did that and all…

      Getting stitched up by the kid she ‘helped’ is ironic

    3. Capt_Bigglesworth on

      I heard of a head teacher correcting SATs papers from his primary school.. he got busted because the indentation from the pencil he used to make corrections could be seen on the papers that were in the pile beneath.
      The schools results that year were annulled. There was a sham investigation by hand picked, ‘tame’ governors who claimed not to find conclusive proof as to who was responsible. Those governors all immediately resigned to prevent any further review. The head is still in post.

    4. Pheasant_Plucker84 on

      I remember my art teacher knocking my uncles door to buy some weed. I was there looking after my cousin so I answered the door. He looked at me, didn’t some calculations and ran…..fucking hilarious. He pretty much did my Art course work for me after that.

    5. Rowdy_Roddy_2022 on

      I’m a teacher and unfortunately flaunting exam board/JCQ guidelines in relation to coursework and controlled assessment is widespread. Even egregious examples of cheating like this one are not exactly rare. The pressure to do this normally comes from a Head of Department keen to make their results look good, but I’ve also heard of Principals who are in on it.

      Fortunately in my school we are fastidious about following the rules. Of course, this creates problems when parents ring in and say, “But I know someone who goes to school X and they were allowed to bring their notes in with them!” etc.

      When all is said and done, better to go purely on written, timed exams.

    6. Coffmad1 on

      My music teacher did this in 2009 for our entire class

      I did not deserve that B aha

    7. Practical-Purchase-9 on

      Scrapping most of the coursework was for the best because schools everywhere play a game of how much they are prepared to bend the rules to compete with everyone else doing the same but not going so far as to feel like cheating. If individual staff feel compelled to ‘help’ students in this manner, what does that say of the culture of the school that prioritises results over academic integrity?

      First school I trained at was one a high performing single-sex comprehensive. A couple students were absent for their coursework and sat with the head of dept after school to complete it. Both for 20/20. Coincidence?

      Coursework had to go. Not because it’s wrong to assess people in ways other than an external exam, but because it’s just fiddled everywhere.

    8. Slow_Price4631 on

      Mate, Ashburton is a dump, its all well and good firing her but she isn’t bringing the school intro disrepute, the school did that to itself

    9. Toochilled77 on

      My German gcse oral test they literally practiced it with us for 40 minutes beforehand.

      I still got a D 😂

    10. Early-Lab2249 on

      I worked as a maths teacher at a really rubbish school with an evil headteacher who also paid themselves an additional salary as a maths teacher on top of their headteacher pay!
      This person pressured the entire maths department to “use writing frames “ to “help” the students with their compulsory 2 pieces of GCSE maths coursework. The coursework was worth 20% of the maths GCSE and could easily push up a student’s grade. This was especially important if a student was on a D but after some help from your friendly neighbourhood maths teacher it would become a C and thus contribute to the all important % of GCSE passes at C or above.

      It was a massive relief to most of the department when it was scrapped. I would imagine the exam boards got sick of marking teachers’ work.

      As for the headteacher they would give the students some of the answers in the actual exam by being in the exam hall under the pretence of invigilation. Back in the day students could put their hands up if they had any queries and this was the loophole that they exploited.

      Even some of the kids would come back to school in September and they’d be like how come so and so did better than me at maths when I was always better at maths than them?

      Incredibly nobody snitched on her to OFSTED or the local papers. Still amazes me today.

    Leave A Reply