Ricordo al momento del massacro di Bucha, annunci che Putin aveva un mandato di arresto internazionale per lui. Come aveva in programma di visitare paesi come nel Medio Oriente; Molto era fatto di “Pensi che proveranno ad arrestarlo?” Con l’imminente incontro di Trump e Putin in Alaska; Avrei ragione nel pensare che non sia più attivo? O ho immaginato tutto insieme?

    https://i.redd.it/fjbokwy05bif1.jpeg

    di ManxMerc

    Share.

    24 commenti

    1. anton_bismarck_9 on

      Indeed…but i presume it won’t happen, the invitation to a reunion in Alaska it’s a stab in the back to Ukraine and NATO, it’s a mockery.

    2. Keep_Being_Still on

      Apparently Alaska was chosen because Putin would need to fly over other countries to get to the continental USA, who would potentially ground the flight to arrest him. But he can fly to Alaska from Russia without crossing any other country’s airspace. FWIW America isn’t party to the ICC either, so it’s unlikely any arrest will be made.

    3. Morepork69 on

      The rule of law disappeared in a puff of orange foundation……

    4. FallenRaptor on

      I’m sure it’s still a thing but it means nothing if host countries don’t act on it.

    5. Argie-Hromadyani on

      Honest and human rights loving USA doesn’t adhere to ICC guidelines.

      That’s why they can meet in american territory.

    6. Herdistheword on

      The U.S. doesn’t recognize international criminal court (probably because a good chunk of our leaders could be tried).

    7. ClassicBit3307 on

      So hypothetically, if Trump sees Putin on American soil, even if the US is not part of the ICC, doesn’t it still mean that he will be “harboring a known criminal” by US law?

    8. Round_Ad_2972 on

      Putin is manipulating Trump. Again. The world gets to see Putin, the war criminal, attend the US without consequences. Who looks strong and who looks weak?

    9. Trumps bestie! I’m sure he has Putin dolls by his bedside table. Posters all over. Why? Because he’s incapable of saying anything bad about him, nor doing anything about him (though he could, and to be fair, Biden dropped the ball on this as well). The difference is how Trump is so eager to give up pieces of Ukraine to his master. Biden never offered any of that

    10. Existing-Sherbet2458 on

      Vladimir putin has been convicted of Terrorism, yet he was allowed to leave to another country and not arrested. Why?

    11. Meet_Downtown on

      Ugh if I had a 100k I’d leave and never come back. We are a fucking joke now.

    12. cookiesandpunch on

      I find it hard to believe that Ukrainians aren’t already in Alaska practicing with legally purchased high-power, scoped rifles.

    13. thisseemslikeagood on

      Treat him the same way all of the Americans that were detained in Russia.

    14. The US refused to be a part of the ICC mainly because this would make US troops subject to the ICC. America has its own justice system for its soldiers and didn’t want a foreign power to have authority over US troops.

    15. njsullyalex on

      I am beyond disappointing in my country for letting this human shitstain war criminal into our country.

    16. Too bad he’ll be protected by the US government. Everyone here, especially in Alaska, bears arms!

    17. Glavurdan on

      I get the outrage, but the US is not a party to ICC. It is ultimately why Putin feels safer traveling to Alaska as opposed to Rome when that was proposed back in May

    Leave A Reply