Sempre più ho notato e sono rimasto infastidito dal fatto che sempre più carboni EV vengono presi da auto non caricate o non EV. Questo è l’aeroporto di Bruxelles, dove l’app di carica mi ha detto che c’erano 185 spazi di ricarica gratuiti, per arrivare lì e trovare 2 punti vuoti. Questo è circa l’80% delle auto parcheggiate nei punti di ricarica che non sono collegati. Lì 210 punti gratuiti al livello successivo e ancora più ulteriormente.
https://www.reddit.com/gallery/1mpt7v6
di michilio
5 commenti
What i don’t really get is how the charge stations work in long term parkings like this. Like you’re supposed to leave it plugged in for a week while you’re abroad?
wow. this must be a summer thing. In normal business season these get used with almost only EVs and PHEVs. Given these parking spots are “far” from the terminal (great design idea! solves half of the wrong parking).
It also doesn’t seem to make sense, on your picture you see even I think an EQA that is not charging. That person for sure should know better.
So how does this work exactly? You leave on holiday for a week, plug in your car after parking, and then end up paying extra euro in idle fees because the car was already fully charged after 3 hours?
I don’t think Interparking can accurately track which vehicles are charging and which ones are ICE. I do sometimes park at P1 and I have to say that it doesn’t say which parking slots are for EV’s and ICE’s, nor that the EV parking slots are reserved only for EV.
Just a small PSA, level 3 has plenty of non-charging parking slots available, which is where I usually park.
I really don’t understand why there are so many EV chargers in the airport. Apart from Tesla’s in sentry mode, EV’s don’t discharge their battery when parking and it’s harmful for the battery to leave it charged with a high state of charge for an extended period of time. They must get some great tax incentives to install that many EV chargers, and it makes sense that most chargers are not in use.