RAGNI Come ci sentiamo riguardo a questo controllo della chat dell’UE che il governo sostiene? Sembra molto distopico secondo me. Possiamo fare qualcosa per fermarlo?

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulation_to_Prevent_and_Combat_Child_Sexual_Abuse

    di buzzbaron

    Share.

    37 commenti

    1. TheChrisD on

      A minority of loud people making a mountain out of a molehill.

    2. Banania2020 on

      [https://fightchatcontrol.eu/](https://fightchatcontrol.eu/)
      *Every photo, every message, every file you send will be automatically scanned—without your consent or suspicion. This is not about catching criminals. It is mass surveillance imposed on all 450 million citizens of the European Union.*

    3. OrganicVlad79 on

      Concerned. A step towards authoritarianism. Similar to that hate speech bill

    4. I think it’s just a thinly veiled attempt to get more information from us disgused as protecting children.

    5. JealousInevitable544 on

      Literally no one in the real world has brought this in conversation.

      Overreach or authoritarian aside, I’d say most people don’t give a shit.

    6. MaelduinTamhlacht on

      Surely it would be better to teach children very seriously in school about love-bombing and gaslighting and online risks, so they’re not at risk from predators (whether online or offline).

    7. They’ll push it through because it’s supposed to catch kiddy fiddlers …………. right. Because kiddy fiddlers, possibly the slyest of all cunts, aren’t just going to use file sharing services or whatever else instead. The most prolific kiddy fiddlers are probably already doing that as it is. They’re not going to stop being kiddy fiddlers anyway, I am certain of that. And sure what happens to kiddy fiddlers in this country when they are caught ? Sweet fuck all.

      Meanwhile *everyone’s* telecommunications privacy has been eroded. And surely the EU or individual member states would never abuse such access. Right ?

    8. olibum86 on

      Unnessry and Concerning. The gaurds have shown before they can’t be trusted with sensitive materials, and I don’t think giving them so much power will make that any better. Authoritarianism is creeping into Europe.

    9. robertdegray on

      Email all our mep’s let them know we don’t want to live in a dystopia. My understanding is too that this bill goes against some constitutional protections in eu countries like Spain. So hopefully it will be amended or blocked.

    10. The3rdbaboon on

      Seems draconian. Where’s the proposal to stop actual child abuse from happening rather than trawling through people’s emails and texts without their consent?

    11. FreeReputation6707 on

      Back to letters I guess.

      Things like this only drive technology on. Someone will come out with a different encryption and way to bypass the whole thing.

    12. PNscreen on

      It’s a terrible piece of legislation and not the direction the EU should be going in.

    13. AluminiumCrackers on

      Not too bothered about it really. Depends on the implementation. If we were in a place like the USA, I’d be worried, but the structure and foundation of the EU, as well as Ireland’s own constitution and laws, make it much less of an issue for me. Our courts have no issue throwing out laws that go too far.

      Now if they were to try and expand it to include copyright or something, I’d have an issue.

    14. LakeFox3 on

      What about legally protected chats between yourself and your legal team?

    15. seamustheseagull on

      There’s no evidence that our government are supporting it.

      When it comes down to a vote, it’s unlikely that it’ll go through, but you can email your MEP to make it clear that you don’t support it and shouldn’t support it.

    16. ivan-ent on

      Yea major bs and very dystopian I agree, nothing to do with protecting children and all to do with tracking people and collecting info.

    17. mastodonj on

      I thought GDPR ensured my right to restrict the processing of my data? Surely this is a breach of GDPR?

    18. mushy_cactus on

      Email your TDs and EU TDs.

      I’ve done it 3 times so far, only 2 replies.

    19. sureyouknowurself on

      Extremely dystopian and won’t achieve it’s stated goal. Which makes me believe this is more about mass surveillance.

      They will want to ban VPN’s next.

    20. barker505 on

      Not a fan at all. Am going to write to my local TD about it

    21. ancapailldorcha on

      I’d almost go so far as to say that this sort of thing makes Brexit look like a great idea. It’s properly intrusive and dystopian. It’d be one thing if it was going to lead to better law enforcement but it’s ultimately about building a law that restricts but doesn’t protect. Here in the UK, the Brits are pushing on with facial recognition software and cameras so there’s that as well.

      >”Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”

      >Benjamin Franklin.

    22. anotherwave1 on

      It’s not possible share any opinion or objective view on this here.

      Edit: Watch the downvotes come flooding in.

    23. I sent an email to them a couple years ago when they first mentioned this and essentially my argument boiled down to this;

      The EU is trying to become the world’s largest collector and distributer of child porn in the world. Regardless of my personal privacy, the privacy of my children is being eroded.

      The private photos my wife and I hold in shared albums over the last 10 years and three kids will now be looked into and catalogued by the government. That means any photos of my kids in the bath as babies, or swimming on holiday etc etc are now being indexed and are accessible.
      The government absolutely cannot guarantee the security of these, and central accessibility to it all means a much much higher risk of bad actors gaining access.

      All this means that the EU is now going to be collecting and potentially distributing the largest collection of illicit material in the world.

      Along with that, is huge concerns over whether someone is going to be interested in why I have a nude baby pic on my cloud, or if that dark humour joke I made privately to a friend is only a joke or a threat.

      I could honestly speak all day about how bad an idea this is, and I’ve already started to mitigate the risks in case this does happen.

      It’s Orwellian in an unprecedented way, and it absolutely needs to be stopped.

    24. TheWesht on

      It’s scary enough as it is with the current ppl in charge. Now, imagine how devastating this regulation will be when the EU is being run by a majority far-right.

    25. Still_Practice_4648 on

      If it requires us to amend our constitution then it need to be a referendum. These things are always watered down considerably anyways. 

    26. alangcarter on

      Actual gangs of terrorists and nonces tend to be quite organized. It takes a one line script to ssh tunnel to some IP address where they can swap CSAM and bomb designs to their twisted hearts content. This is about mass surveillence of the law abiding population.

    27. BlackTree78910 on

      Not happy about it but if there’s one thing I’ve learned about this world is that it doesn’t seem to matter what the general people think or want, only what’s best for out poxy capitalist society. There has to be a better system and solution to all our problems, but that will probably cost money where this will probably make another small amount of people rich. It’s fucking depressing that or world cares more about a bottom line instead of what would actually make our society better.

    28. Original-Salt9990 on

      If anything I’m surprised it hasn’t happened sooner.

      People generally don’t care about things like privacy and free speech, and you see it all the time with how hard people advocate for things like hate speech laws and online censorship.

      This is just a natural continuation of this line of thinking. I have no doubt whatsoever that measures like this are going to be enacted in basically all western countries over the coming years and decades.

    29. Character_Affect3842 on

      I go to the pub and talk to the auld pintman. Surely they get a tad bit lost about my LLM shit talking but it’s grand.

    30. KatarnsBeard on

      Don’t worry lads the guards don’t have the technology or the manpower to be surveilling everyone’s friend/porn/death video WhatsApp groups

    31. TheSameButBetter on

      Some years ago I sadly resigned myself to accept that over time the government is going to want to surveill us more and more. It’s true as night follows day that if the technology exists for the the government to get a bit more nosy, then they will take advantage of it. 

      My attitude is to simply accept it it’s going to happen and I as an individual will opt-out of being surveilled. Technology wise the cat is out of the bag, they can legislate for all the big internet platforms to analyse my communications, but I can switch to a different platform they have no control over. There are so many options out there to protect yourself from surveillance that no government will ever be able to control or intercept. 

      This is all about normalizing everyday surveillance, I don’t for a minute accept the arguments that it’s about protecting children or preventing crime. The reality is that any savvy criminal will already be using secure platforms to communicate, this legislation won’t help prevent serious crime in any meaningful way. 

    32. CorrectMention6 on

      And they wonder why the far right are rising in popularity across Europe, I’m not far right or do I support them but if I have a choice between them or politicians that want erase my right to privacy and freedom of speech and exclude themselves from the same, then I think I’d leaning 1 way more than the other.
      This behavior by government’s is what resulted in Trump coming to power.
      Stupid decisions equal stupid results.

    Leave A Reply