Le differenze di ricetta giustificano davvero il prezzo più elevato o è solo marketing?

    Ingredienti:

    Originale: farina di grano, zuccheroolio di girasole, lievito, sale da tavola, estratto di malto d’orzo, latte condensatopolvere di uovo intero (fienile), vitamine (vitamina B1, vitamina B2, niacina, vitamina B6, acido folico), sale minerale (ferro).

    Fitness: farina di grano, olio di girasole, lievito, estratto di malto d’orzo, crusca di granosale da tavola, latte scremato in polverepolvere di uovo intero (fienile), vitamine (niacina, vitamina B6, vitamina B1, riboflavine, acido folico), sale minerale (ferro).

    https://i.redd.it/nj59t8971kkf1.png

    di Equivalent_Poem_7708

    Share.

    12 commenti

    1. krikszkraksz on

      Because it needed a huge amount of R&D investments to find our how not to add sugar😂 Plus the blue paint is more expensive than the yellow. Who knows?!

    2. DifficultyTricky7779 on

      Because sugar is the cheapest ingredient, so whatever you replace it with makes the product more expensive?

      Because making something tasty without using sugar is more difficult?

      Because they know you’ll just pay more anyway?

    3. MOTUkraken on

      They likely have to produce smaller quantities of the fitness one and thus have higher cost.

      Bulk quantities are generally lower price the higher the quantity is.

    4. Fresh-Adagio on

      because quantities are smaller as no sane person buy fitness Zwieback?

    5. I think they can charge even more if they put a “protein” label on it (eggs).. what a miss from marketing team..

    6. No_Cantaloupe_4149 on

      To call it “Fitness” is already quite scammy. I guess the raised cost ist for “fitness”

    Leave A Reply