Peter Kyle more worried about imaginary VPN paedophiles than actual ones it seems. Labour have managed to hit all the squares in a row on the irony bingo card the last two weeks.
GuyLookingForPorn on
Ultimately Mandelson had just one job – get along with Trump. And from that frame of reference he admittedly was the most qualified candidate.
He wasn’t selected despite his links to the mega rich, he was selected *because* of them.
parasoralophus on
I made the point about his Epstein connections when he was appointed and the Guardian repeatedly deleted all comments about it. Guess it’s ok to talk about now.
Remarkable_Misty on
Wow how are labour this stupid exspecially with the things they come out with
Shadaesus on
I mean, he probably knew most of the American politicians as friends of a friend.
JoetotheB on
Surely we have plenty of talented and skilled people who could have performed this role?
We’re talking as if it was just him and another guy who would have met the criteria. He had connections to an incredibly shady and corrupt person and shouldn’t have been considered from a moral standpoint alone.
AFulhamImmigrant on
This is a genuine question, was he worth the risk? What would we have got if he hadn’t been there?
Youbunchoftwats on
How will the conversation go with Trump this week? Everyone going nuts at an ex-US ambassador for something that MAGA think is a non-story. How can a Prime Minister look Trump in the eye and explain that Mandy was sacked for colluding with a trafficker and sex offender, when Trump had exactly the same relationship with the same nonce?
palmerama on
What’s quite funny was Mandelson hasn’t done much wrong in the position (other than the cringey arse licking). He’s paying the price for a bad decision that Starmer and team made.
GianfrancoZoey on
The framing of this is all wrong. Mandelson and McSweeney control the Labour Party and Petey was given the job of ambassador because *he* wanted it. He’s always loved swanning around with the ‘upper’ class
Aromatic_Staff_4047 on
Mandelson should never have been appointed but, fuck me – just who the hell is in charge of Labour’s PR?? They should know that, when in a hole, you stop digging – right?
cozywit on
Why are we lamenting the firing of a guy for the exact reason we hired him?
cactusnan on
Except he really wasn’t the humiliation of the fallout from his appointment.
Man_in_the_uk on
Looks like he’ll be joining Rayner with her recent picture of her downing a large glass of white wine.
LizzyGreene1933 on
Great ambassador? For what? Is this what you think Britain is for, friends of convicted pedophiles, sex trafficking and who knows what else?
kpreen on
Dig up, stupid!
GhostRiders on
Hiring Mandelson was always going to end in disaster. You just have to look back at Mandelson’s history to know that he is poison.
To me it yet another example of Starmers poor political judgement
stbens on
Apparently Mandelson replaced a very popular and well liked Ambassador who was well liked and respected even by Trump himself. Maybe she didn’t want to stay on but it seems to me that Starmer was desperate to employ somebody with a very shady past and who even MI6 had concerns about. I do wonder what Mandelson has on Starmer.
shugthedug3 on
Worth what risk?
What exactly did appointing this associate of a known child sex trafficker achieve? it was always nudge-nudge and clearly designed to provoke Trump by making it very obvious we know what they were all up to.
Everyone fucking knew about Mandelson and Epstein.
you_aint_seen_me- on
And it probably was. His reputation proceeded him and I imagine those that knew, hoped this would never see the light of day.
jodrellbank_pants on
He should be binned as well
They were all hoping nothing would creep into the news
Terrible thought process
All hands together, boys from the upper classes sticking together.
Stuff like this needs stamping on but it never will be because the boys from Eaton won’t allow it
Porticulus on
Too much nonce protecting in government (and politics in general) for my liking. Something needs to change or society is truly fucked.
Logical-Brief-420 on
Well he clearly wasn’t was he Mr Kyle, why don’t you spend more time understanding how VPNs work and less time defending the indefensible?
23 commenti
Peter Kyle more worried about imaginary VPN paedophiles than actual ones it seems. Labour have managed to hit all the squares in a row on the irony bingo card the last two weeks.
Ultimately Mandelson had just one job – get along with Trump. And from that frame of reference he admittedly was the most qualified candidate.
He wasn’t selected despite his links to the mega rich, he was selected *because* of them.
I made the point about his Epstein connections when he was appointed and the Guardian repeatedly deleted all comments about it. Guess it’s ok to talk about now.
Wow how are labour this stupid exspecially with the things they come out with
I mean, he probably knew most of the American politicians as friends of a friend.
Surely we have plenty of talented and skilled people who could have performed this role?
We’re talking as if it was just him and another guy who would have met the criteria. He had connections to an incredibly shady and corrupt person and shouldn’t have been considered from a moral standpoint alone.
This is a genuine question, was he worth the risk? What would we have got if he hadn’t been there?
How will the conversation go with Trump this week? Everyone going nuts at an ex-US ambassador for something that MAGA think is a non-story. How can a Prime Minister look Trump in the eye and explain that Mandy was sacked for colluding with a trafficker and sex offender, when Trump had exactly the same relationship with the same nonce?
What’s quite funny was Mandelson hasn’t done much wrong in the position (other than the cringey arse licking). He’s paying the price for a bad decision that Starmer and team made.
The framing of this is all wrong. Mandelson and McSweeney control the Labour Party and Petey was given the job of ambassador because *he* wanted it. He’s always loved swanning around with the ‘upper’ class
Mandelson should never have been appointed but, fuck me – just who the hell is in charge of Labour’s PR?? They should know that, when in a hole, you stop digging – right?
Why are we lamenting the firing of a guy for the exact reason we hired him?
Except he really wasn’t the humiliation of the fallout from his appointment.
Looks like he’ll be joining Rayner with her recent picture of her downing a large glass of white wine.
Great ambassador? For what? Is this what you think Britain is for, friends of convicted pedophiles, sex trafficking and who knows what else?
Dig up, stupid!
Hiring Mandelson was always going to end in disaster. You just have to look back at Mandelson’s history to know that he is poison.
To me it yet another example of Starmers poor political judgement
Apparently Mandelson replaced a very popular and well liked Ambassador who was well liked and respected even by Trump himself. Maybe she didn’t want to stay on but it seems to me that Starmer was desperate to employ somebody with a very shady past and who even MI6 had concerns about. I do wonder what Mandelson has on Starmer.
Worth what risk?
What exactly did appointing this associate of a known child sex trafficker achieve? it was always nudge-nudge and clearly designed to provoke Trump by making it very obvious we know what they were all up to.
Everyone fucking knew about Mandelson and Epstein.
And it probably was. His reputation proceeded him and I imagine those that knew, hoped this would never see the light of day.
He should be binned as well
They were all hoping nothing would creep into the news
Terrible thought process
All hands together, boys from the upper classes sticking together.
Stuff like this needs stamping on but it never will be because the boys from Eaton won’t allow it
Too much nonce protecting in government (and politics in general) for my liking. Something needs to change or society is truly fucked.
Well he clearly wasn’t was he Mr Kyle, why don’t you spend more time understanding how VPNs work and less time defending the indefensible?