Un uomo in Svizzera sta affrontando 10 giorni di prigione dopo aver rifiutato di pagare una multa per un post “offensivo” dei social media. Emanuel Brünisholz, un riparatore di strumenti a fiato di Burgdorf, è stato condannato in base alle leggi anti-discriminazione per aver fatto una dichiarazione sottolineando la prova scheletrica del sesso binario. Il calvario di Brünisholz iniziò nel dicembre del 2022 quando rispose a un post di Facebook dal membro del consiglio nazionale svizzero Andreas Glarner
Fonte
Sì, i suoi commenti non erano in alcun modo belli, ma non sta andando un po ‘troppo lontano? Questo sembra allarmante come ciò che sta accadendo nel Regno Unito. Non si dovrebbe essere incarcerati per un commento di Facebook e non riesco a credere che questa possa essere una dichiarazione controversa.
Don't like transphobes but isn't this concerning?
byu/GapOk8804 inSwitzerland
di GapOk8804
11 commenti
what? in switzerland too ? i thought it could happen only in third world countries like UK
but for real what did he exactly say
His statement wasn’t even wrong. The world’s going downhill real fast
I doubt that this is all on this story.
E: its clear that he said way worse stuff than that, otherwise no one wouldve given a shit about him. Anyway, he gets what he deserves.
actually, you’re liable for hate speech on your social media
I’d need to get a hold of the whole statement the person made to be able to discuss whether it’s over the top or right to react that way
yeah… that source is not trustworthy. Doesn‘t mean it‘s wrong necessarily, but I wouldn‘t junp to conclusions from this.
1. What is this source?
2. In Switzerland you get “Tagessatz” our “jour-amende” in French. Which translate to Day-fine. Which basically replaced a certain amount of jail time by a fine. You can choose to either pay or do the jail time. For most people it just means it’s a fine… **HE Decided HIMSELF** tondo the jail time instead.
He called trans people mentally ill and got a fine for it. I don‘t see the problem. Hate speech has consequences.
I’m curious which part of the quote is the part that was used in the judgement:
>If you dig up LGBTQI people after 200 years, you’ll only find men and women based on their skeletons. Everything else is a mental illness promoted through the curriculum.
The first part seems like a simple statement of fact, the second part could be interpreted as a problematic opinion.
The state putting someone behind bars for a Facebook comment is deeply troubling in principle. It feels like a slippery slope toward suppressing unpopular opinion*.
^(*Opinion, **not** facts, nor I agree in particular with what he said.)
Greetings.
<];{
It’s probably because he called it a”mental illness”. Under the law it makes sense, that is kind of “degrading”.
I think the restrictions on free speech are stupid anyways, it should be a “1st amendment” esque rule instead of whatever the hell this is. Let the people speak their mind…
And it’s going to start happening in CH real soon.
That’s what you get when you live in a leftist society (like CH).
I might get banned from this sub but I don’t give a flying fuck.