Even if it end ups with a No, it will be introduced. Mark my words.
b00nish on
Most likely it will pass. Small towns in rural areas finish counting first. Big cities later. So if something that is more likely to be accepted in the cities is already 50:50 now, it will probably be accepted at the end of the day.
(The “Eigenmietwert” is the opposite: here the yes % will probably get lower during the next few hours. But it will still pass.)
No_Appeal_676 on
It is a pity we can’t explain it better.
This would only be good, but the FUD is strong.
swisstraeng on
As long as it’s optional… Last one was private run so that’s a straight no.
But this approach seems better.
QualitySufficient170 on
Let us hope that it is rejected.
Ossigen on
I really don’t get why someone would vote against this. I head people saying this would allow the state to gather private information, but how does a physical ID prevent that? It’s the exact same information, no?
8 commenti
I’ll be sad if it does not get accepted
Pensioners?
There’s hope!
Even if it end ups with a No, it will be introduced. Mark my words.
Most likely it will pass. Small towns in rural areas finish counting first. Big cities later. So if something that is more likely to be accepted in the cities is already 50:50 now, it will probably be accepted at the end of the day.
(The “Eigenmietwert” is the opposite: here the yes % will probably get lower during the next few hours. But it will still pass.)
It is a pity we can’t explain it better.
This would only be good, but the FUD is strong.
As long as it’s optional… Last one was private run so that’s a straight no.
But this approach seems better.
Let us hope that it is rejected.
I really don’t get why someone would vote against this. I head people saying this would allow the state to gather private information, but how does a physical ID prevent that? It’s the exact same information, no?