Farage could be charged for murdering an orphan and his support would not waver. He is a post truth, Trump like figure who is not bound by norms. He has won by default, IMO.
do_or_pie on
> MPs must register any shareholdings above £70,000, however the code of conduct states that they should also record “any relevant financial interest or material benefit”, including a sub-threshold shareholding that “meets the test of relevance; in other words, that it might reasonably be thought by others to influence a member’s actions or words as a member”.
> At least 13 other MPs have registered sub-threshold shareholdings in firms such as wealth management and an adventure leisure company.
> Reform did not address this in its response.
Why would Reform? They duck dive and dodge any tough questions. Like Nigel’s relationship with Nathan Gill, or where his girlfriend got the money for the Clacton house.
DontPokeMe91 on
If he was such an honest, law abiding, stand up citizen why does controversy follow him everywhere he goes? Joke of a leader.
RedofPaw on
Oh, are there consequences? Anything?
No?
Then he will do it.
Yes?
Then why are we not seeing them.
Parliament has too many rules that rely on honor or shame. Nigel has neither.
NuggetKing9001 on
How name politicians have “scandals” for some dodgy dealings that they deny, then apologisefor, then resign for? They only apologise cause they get caught. They’ve all got some shady shit under the bonnet, let’s not delude ourselves otherwise.
Von_Uber on
Yeah but he drinks a pint down the pub! Nigel ‘Russia Today’ commodities broker Farage is one of Us!
TheLyam on
Wouldn’t put it pass the man who appears to be lying about SDLT to lie about this.
7 commenti
Farage could be charged for murdering an orphan and his support would not waver. He is a post truth, Trump like figure who is not bound by norms. He has won by default, IMO.
> MPs must register any shareholdings above £70,000, however the code of conduct states that they should also record “any relevant financial interest or material benefit”, including a sub-threshold shareholding that “meets the test of relevance; in other words, that it might reasonably be thought by others to influence a member’s actions or words as a member”.
> At least 13 other MPs have registered sub-threshold shareholdings in firms such as wealth management and an adventure leisure company.
> Reform did not address this in its response.
Why would Reform? They duck dive and dodge any tough questions. Like Nigel’s relationship with Nathan Gill, or where his girlfriend got the money for the Clacton house.
If he was such an honest, law abiding, stand up citizen why does controversy follow him everywhere he goes? Joke of a leader.
Oh, are there consequences? Anything?
No?
Then he will do it.
Yes?
Then why are we not seeing them.
Parliament has too many rules that rely on honor or shame. Nigel has neither.
How name politicians have “scandals” for some dodgy dealings that they deny, then apologisefor, then resign for? They only apologise cause they get caught. They’ve all got some shady shit under the bonnet, let’s not delude ourselves otherwise.
Yeah but he drinks a pint down the pub! Nigel ‘Russia Today’ commodities broker Farage is one of Us!
Wouldn’t put it pass the man who appears to be lying about SDLT to lie about this.