He never seems to tire of deriding “net stupid zero”, but Reform UK’s deputy leader, Richard Tice, has a 15-year business record of support for sustainability and green energy initiatives.
The Reform party has made opposition to green energy and net zero part of its policy platform. Its founder, Nigel Farage, has called net zero policies a “lunacy”; the party has called to lift the ban on fracking for fossil gas; and one of the first Reform-led councils, Kent, rescinded last month its declaration of a climate emergency
However, companies led by Tice since 2011 boasted of their commitments to saving energy, cutting CO2 emissions and environmental responsibility. One told investors it had introduced a “green charter” to “mitigate our impact on climate change” and later hired a “full-time sustainability manager” as part of “its focus on energy efficiency and sustainability”.
Another said it was “keen to play its part in reducing emissions for cleaner air” and said it had saved “hundreds of tonnes of CO2” by installing solar cells on the rooftops of its properties.
A glance at Tice’s account on X reveals contempt for warnings of climate breakdown and efforts to mitigate it. Last year he said: “We are not in climate emergency; nor is there a climate crisis.” In May he stated: “Solar farms are wrong at every level” and insisted they would “destroy food security, destroy jobs [and] destroy property values”.
He recently adopted the slogan “net stupid zero”, describing efforts to neutralise the UK’s fossil fuel emissions as “the most costly self-inflicted wound in modern British history”.
But Steff Wright, a sustainability entrepreneur and former commercial tenant of Tice, found that statements in the annual reports from CLS Holdings and Quidnet Reit, property companies led by Tice, contradicted his public position.
BobMonkhaus on
Man helps to save energy and makes money at the same time as personally disliking it shocker.
Investment isn’t about what you like, it’s about what gets you a nice return. I hate cheese and onion crisps, but I’d happily invest in them if I got a solid return.
FlaviousTiberius on
I think the annoying thing about a lot of the backlash against emissions reduction ideas is a lot of them do go hand in hand with energy independence.
Renewables and nuclear would both allow us not to have to pander to the likes of Saudi Arabia or Russia, particularly when gas and oil are both just getting more and more expensive over time.
No-One-4845 on
I don’t really think this is any kind of gotcha. He’s not so wealthy or powerful that he can use his businesses to assert his personal ideology, so the fact that those businesses are paying lip-service and/or complying is the price of doing business. If the winds change, those same businesses will quickly row back that lip-service/compliance. It’s no different to all those American businesses who did the same around things like DEI, only to row back on most of that stuff as soon as they got a whiff of a Trump Presidency.
I’m sure, on a personal level, that he’d much prefer a far more libertarian business environment where his businesses didn’t have to swallow the perceived costs associated with net zero, but he doesn’t have that luxury right now. I’m sure that’s what will happen if/when he wins power, unless those businesses break with him entirely.
TomsBookReviews on
Fifteen years ago our domestic energy prices were 14% below the IEA median, today they’re 46% above the IEA median. I’d say he was wrong to support those initiatives, but it’s good that he’s gotten there eventually.
inevitablelizard on
“Net stupid zero” is such a stupid and low calibre phrase for Tice to use as an insult. It’s as if a 5 year old came up with it.
6 commenti
He never seems to tire of deriding “net stupid zero”, but Reform UK’s deputy leader, Richard Tice, has a 15-year business record of support for sustainability and green energy initiatives.
The Reform party has made opposition to green energy and net zero part of its policy platform. Its founder, Nigel Farage, has called net zero policies a “lunacy”; the party has called to lift the ban on fracking for fossil gas; and one of the first Reform-led councils, Kent, rescinded last month its declaration of a climate emergency
However, companies led by Tice since 2011 boasted of their commitments to saving energy, cutting CO2 emissions and environmental responsibility. One told investors it had introduced a “green charter” to “mitigate our impact on climate change” and later hired a “full-time sustainability manager” as part of “its focus on energy efficiency and sustainability”.
Another said it was “keen to play its part in reducing emissions for cleaner air” and said it had saved “hundreds of tonnes of CO2” by installing solar cells on the rooftops of its properties.
A glance at Tice’s account on X reveals contempt for warnings of climate breakdown and efforts to mitigate it. Last year he said: “We are not in climate emergency; nor is there a climate crisis.” In May he stated: “Solar farms are wrong at every level” and insisted they would “destroy food security, destroy jobs [and] destroy property values”.
He recently adopted the slogan “net stupid zero”, describing efforts to neutralise the UK’s fossil fuel emissions as “the most costly self-inflicted wound in modern British history”.
But Steff Wright, a sustainability entrepreneur and former commercial tenant of Tice, found that statements in the annual reports from CLS Holdings and Quidnet Reit, property companies led by Tice, contradicted his public position.
Man helps to save energy and makes money at the same time as personally disliking it shocker.
Investment isn’t about what you like, it’s about what gets you a nice return. I hate cheese and onion crisps, but I’d happily invest in them if I got a solid return.
I think the annoying thing about a lot of the backlash against emissions reduction ideas is a lot of them do go hand in hand with energy independence.
Renewables and nuclear would both allow us not to have to pander to the likes of Saudi Arabia or Russia, particularly when gas and oil are both just getting more and more expensive over time.
I don’t really think this is any kind of gotcha. He’s not so wealthy or powerful that he can use his businesses to assert his personal ideology, so the fact that those businesses are paying lip-service and/or complying is the price of doing business. If the winds change, those same businesses will quickly row back that lip-service/compliance. It’s no different to all those American businesses who did the same around things like DEI, only to row back on most of that stuff as soon as they got a whiff of a Trump Presidency.
I’m sure, on a personal level, that he’d much prefer a far more libertarian business environment where his businesses didn’t have to swallow the perceived costs associated with net zero, but he doesn’t have that luxury right now. I’m sure that’s what will happen if/when he wins power, unless those businesses break with him entirely.
Fifteen years ago our domestic energy prices were 14% below the IEA median, today they’re 46% above the IEA median. I’d say he was wrong to support those initiatives, but it’s good that he’s gotten there eventually.
“Net stupid zero” is such a stupid and low calibre phrase for Tice to use as an insult. It’s as if a 5 year old came up with it.