That’s not good at all, since meddling during an election is a most foul felony.
I think the Netherlands should start ban that sh*t until solid decision at EU level are taken.
Smart-Protection-845 on
Then ban those who don’t show up and call it a day?
KevinBaudruche on
Their algorithms are polarizing content and dividing people, destroying democracies and promoting anti-intellectualism.
How can they defend that ? They prefer to dodge and to pay lobbyists, simply.
Atalant on
That is shady as hell. In other words we have to assume foreign actors does in fact meddle in the Dutch election, in this case USA, inwich is supposed to be an “ally”. This should prioritised on European level over Chatcontrol. This is huge security risk.
We have local elections in Denmark soon, so this is mildly terrifying(although PET and FET already warned about American interference in about Greenlandian affairs).
absurdherowaw on
Should be banned in NL then as a threat to democracy, simple as.
TheoryOfDevolution on
>Volt MP Marieke Koekkoek can’t understand why these companies won’t send someone to speak with parliament. “They are large multinationals that employ a lot of people, and this is about our democracy. We are not asking this lightly.”
Didn’t they only gave barely a week notice to these companies? Common courtesy is two weeks. Expecting a response is reasonable but the invitation should also be reasonable.
>GroenLinks-PvdA MP Karthmann agrees. “You’re invited to a meeting about the security of our elections. They’re all companies with more than 10,000 employees. I read it like you’re too lazy to come,” she said. “I really hope they answer the phone when Prime Minister Schoof calls to say something’s wrong.”
Sure they can send some low-level employee but then this MP will get insulted that they sent a low-level employee. If you want an exec, they’d have to wait. I’d have to wait if I want to meet with my MP because they’re busy.
Crafty_Apple9714 on
Ban that shit, we have eu social media that can replace them
7 commenti
That’s not good at all, since meddling during an election is a most foul felony.
I think the Netherlands should start ban that sh*t until solid decision at EU level are taken.
Then ban those who don’t show up and call it a day?
Their algorithms are polarizing content and dividing people, destroying democracies and promoting anti-intellectualism.
How can they defend that ? They prefer to dodge and to pay lobbyists, simply.
That is shady as hell. In other words we have to assume foreign actors does in fact meddle in the Dutch election, in this case USA, inwich is supposed to be an “ally”. This should prioritised on European level over Chatcontrol. This is huge security risk.
We have local elections in Denmark soon, so this is mildly terrifying(although PET and FET already warned about American interference in about Greenlandian affairs).
Should be banned in NL then as a threat to democracy, simple as.
>Volt MP Marieke Koekkoek can’t understand why these companies won’t send someone to speak with parliament. “They are large multinationals that employ a lot of people, and this is about our democracy. We are not asking this lightly.”
Didn’t they only gave barely a week notice to these companies? Common courtesy is two weeks. Expecting a response is reasonable but the invitation should also be reasonable.
>GroenLinks-PvdA MP Karthmann agrees. “You’re invited to a meeting about the security of our elections. They’re all companies with more than 10,000 employees. I read it like you’re too lazy to come,” she said. “I really hope they answer the phone when Prime Minister Schoof calls to say something’s wrong.”
Sure they can send some low-level employee but then this MP will get insulted that they sent a low-level employee. If you want an exec, they’d have to wait. I’d have to wait if I want to meet with my MP because they’re busy.
Ban that shit, we have eu social media that can replace them