Gli escursionisti di Wicklow vengono colpiti da costi di 38.000 euro dopo aver perso il libro di lancio del ricorso per diritto di precedenza per aiutare a ridurre i debiti

    https://www.independent.ie/regionals/wicklow/bray-news/wicklow-walkers-hit-with-costs-of-38000-after-losing-right-of-way-appeal-launch-book-to-help-cut-debts/a997676986.html

    di PoppedCork

    Share.

    5 commenti

    1. PoppedCork on

      Looks like they seriously misjudged their chances and now it’s backfired hard. €38k in legal costs is a brutal outcome shows how risky it is to take these kinds of cases to court without rock-solid ground.

    2. New-Stick-8764 on

      I’m not going to buy a guidebook by two lads who clearly don’t know where I can actually walk.

    3. Key_Duck_6293 on

      No offence but I’m not buying a book from two aul lads who dont know where you can and cant walk, im sure they can afford to pay for their own blunders

    4. Starkidof9 on

      yeah, it’s surprising how little people realise how bad Ireland’s public access situation is. the comments here, and people wonder why FF and FG keep getting back in. Ireland has some of the worst right of ways in the World. Throw on top utterly crazy “pathways” on public roads with dangerous drivers down the country and it’s a shitshow. Im currently in Killaloe, and the Clare way is a joke. The postman nearly killed me on a blind bend, one that is designated as a “way”. You’re taking your life in your hands on some of those roads.

      I applaud the landowners of places like the Pollagh trail who open up their land not people who help prosecute two walkers. Nobody should support an over zealous regulation of land that has very dubious and complicated history i.e colonial confiscation, debt purchases, over intensive farming, the land act entrenching land hoarding etc etc. The suing of farmers, landowners is wrong as well.

      We need to encourage more right of way, not less. We really should have an equivalent of right to roam. And that should not include dogs, or allowing people sue farmers.

    5. This was a case involving a local walking/rambling group and trying to keep open what they believed to be a right of way. They lost, which in a way is unfortunate for us all, and I don’t begrudge them asking for help with the bill. This is different to groups of thugs trespassing on fields and scoping out farmers sheds.

    Leave A Reply