Esattamente quanto tempo ha a disposizione la polizia per recuperare i gioielli rubati del Louvre prima che scompaiano per sempre

    https://thetab.com/2025/10/20/exactly-how-long-police-have-to-recover-the-stolen-louvre-jewels-before-theyre-gone-forever

    di jerkoff1610

    Share.

    33 commenti

    1. Aggravating_Bar_8097 on

      The reckoned the Hatton Garden stuff was out of the UK with in hours instead off being in wheelie bins waiting to be counted lol. It really depends on the thieves after plan same with Securitas 53 million in cash the found large amounts but never get it all. I’d like to see it returned to the Museum as its historical but dare say if they are lucky they might recover some of it .

    2. Dizzy_Database_119 on

      Does that mean this art expert is 100% sure that the thieves want to dismantle these jewels whose main value is the history? If it’s going to be sold to a private collection then my expert opinion says they will either find it yesterday or after a year, not in-between.

    3. QuotableMorceau on

      has anyone looked in the British Museum for them? history teaches us that the first place we need to look for stolen priceless artefacts is there…

    4. NORmannen10 on

      What is the point in stealing so famous jewels and artwork? Who wants this if they cannot put it up on display in fear of it being recognised? What is the value?

      Some could feel powerful by actually being able to get their hands on this, but is it really worth it?

    5. lokicramer on

      When something is stolen in France, the police legally only have 30 days to locate it.

      After which, the property is written off, and no charges can be filed if the thief is eventually found.

      Summarized for you all.

    6. Dramatic-Set8761 on

      Were the real jewels on display, or were they costume replicas?

    7. FrozenHuE on

      So the european countries cannot keep their history safe? maybe we should send the remainig pieces to other countries to avoid loosing part of mankind history =)

    8. julien_091003 on

      The world can now see how insanely bad our politician are to have permitted this theft to take place.

      Like the The windows in the room weren’t bulletproof, there weren’t any security guards with tasers or anything like that. No. Absolutely disgraceful. Everyone involved in this scandal should resign immediately. But of course, since this is France, they won’t.

    9. bindermichi on

      Unless they have acreage it will take a while, but they will surface again eventually. Most stolen art does as it is hard to sell.

      Someone will snitch

    10. Positive_Conflict_26 on

      Lol, there is no way these guys are still in Europe. Get real, it will be decades/centuries before they are discovered in the private collection of some oil tycoon or something.

    11. BlueSky86010 on

      They had probably 3 hours. That ship sailed long ago. Gems will be re-cut, gold will be melted down will be unrecognisable after a few hours

    12. InformationNew66 on

      Is this article serious?

      > “So, what will the robbers likely do with the stolen items? Because the jewels are easily identifiable, experts believe the thieves will try to dismantle and destroy them if they are not quickly recovered.”

      I don’t think someone would just steal these special and unique items just to dismantle and destroy them. What’s the point of that?

    13. One-Shirt4570 on

       My daughter was there yesterday and ready to enter when police and museum officials pushed everyone out. As an American, we expect the worst. I’m relieved it was just the basis for a new Netflix movie. 

    14. Withering_to_Death on

      It depends. If it’s a commissioned job, then they can stay intact in some “private collection”

    15. We can only hope they were filling an order for a billionaire.

    16. WhyOhWhy60 on

      It’s tragic this happened. Security was so bad it’s possible in broad daylight to drive up to the museum in a vehicle with a ladder mounted on the back, erect the ladder and for robbers to climb it, all in broad daylight.

    17. No-Tomatillo3698 on

      Who knows? The thing is, these jewels will be extremy hard to sell as they are. Every expert will know what they look like. 

      So unless they are destroyed and all the elements sold seperately, you can consider them implossible to sell. 

      I don’t know what the penalties are for stealing and destroying national treasures, but I Imagine it being a bit higher than just stealing these jewels.

    18. MercatorLondon on

      These jewels are not sellable in real world and melting them doesn’t make sense because it is not material value here. My guess is they will appear soon in a banana box at Louvre steps (after the undisclosed ransom is paid)

    19. Thesorus on

      Is there any *real* value in the gold and gems if they melt the gold and dismantle the pieces ?

      The value is the whole jewelry, not the parts.

      It’s not that diamonds are hard to find these days (and the green ones)

    20. EU-Best-Thing-Ever on

      Some billionaire is already wearing them on his head while pleasuring himself in the mirror

    21. rzwitserloot on

      This is, obviously, from somebody (name: Arthur Brand) ‘in the scene’ by word of mouth so they might as well have made it up. But this guy __recovered__ a stolen Van Gogh 3.5 years after it was stolen (the painting “Lentetuin, de pastorietuin te Nuenen in het voorjaar” (pastoral garden in the city of Nuenen in spring) was stolen in 2020):

      According to Arthur, that painting went round the criminal scene like a hot potato. Everybody just tossed in that painting as a way to sweeten the deal. Clearly nobody had any idea how to sell it; that painting was and will remain _way_ too hot to actually sell for serious money.

      In the end some drugs baron that got caught wanted to use it to knock a few months off of their sentence. Except, this drugs baron wasn’t themselves involved in the stealing of the painting. So, offering it for sentence reduction doesn’t work because it implies you admit to another crime (receiving and dealing in stolen goods knowingly), so exactly how much sentence reduction is it really going to get you? It __would__ be an absolutely fantastic tool for reducing sentences for those involved in the actual stealing of the painting, but those had all already been caught and had sat out their time; there was no sentence left to reduce with this painting for anybody.

      So, round and round it went until criminal gangs didn’t want it as a ‘sweetener’ _at all_ given that getting caught with it in your possession just makes things worse.

      So eventually some criminal owner just handed it over to Arthur Brand. According to Arthur, no strings attached and at no cost. They just wanted to be rid of it.

      All very amateuristic. Here’s hoping the same thing will happen here. Except, there’s presumably some value to be obtained from deconstructing the goods here. Fortunately with the Van Gogh that wasn’t nearly as feasible.

    22. Robborboy on

      I can’t wait for the movie based on this in a couple years.

    23. Smorgas-board on

      Already too late. They definitely aren’t waiting a week to get things done

    Leave A Reply