Close Menu
    Europa

    Lancio del Comitato d’Azione per gli Stati Uniti d’Europa

    Share.
    View 30 Comments

    30 commenti

    3. LoveIsBread on

      Rn, the EU is primarily a vehicle for neoliberal politics, managing the status quo. Until the EU is completely revamped, I see no reason to support further integration.

    4. WannysTheThird on

      “Only the United Soviet Republics of Europe can lead us to brighter tommorows”

      Yeah, no. Death to Red Menace.

    5. ex4channer on

      I think that the good thing about EU is that it in fact is not a single country. It can work very well the way it is right now, we just need good politicians in place to make the good decisions.

    6. Flynn317 on

      George Orwell would have had tonsay something about that. When two tribes go to……..

    7. Kangouwou on

      Well then, the declaration appears justified regarding the challenges that are presented. Let’s hear people that disagree and their arguments !

    8. Worldly-Cherry9631 on

      Not a fan of the name. I think European Federation works just fine

    9. NonSekTur on

      A foreigner, but very supportive of the (overall) idea. Good luck/Boa sorte!

      However, “United States of Europe” is a stupid name.

    10. kneyght on

      War in the Middle East means we have to give up sovereignty? I don’t understand.

    14. carlos_castanos on

      No mention of migration as a challenge yet there is a mention of demographics as a challenge. I have a feeling where this is going…

    15. Zeraru on

      Putting aside any personal judgement on whether this would be a good or a bad thing in principle, it’s very obvious that it would be a monumental task for very bright minds to even IMAGINE a political system that can promise to work despite the language barriers and strong national identities of the member states, while convincing them to relinquish further power to an above-national level AND simultaneously covering all the potential issues that became awfully apparent across the pond AND in the existing EU framework.

      To spell it out: The existence of members with disproportional voting/veto power which are ALREADY prime targets for hostile internal and external actors to jeopardize the entire system through targeted corruption and exploiting the electorate through the disinformation age we live in.

      These countries have little reason to AGREE to giving up their disproportionate power, even if they’re not currently already political tumors like Hungary.

    16. cyberdork on

      Never gonna happen. Just look at what parties are gaining all across Europe. It’s the exact opposite side of the spectrum.

    17. MaximePierce on

      The overal idea I am not against, but no way we call it the United States of Europe… We are not the USA (thank god)

    18. Matthew_1453 on

      Fuck that, especially mentioning the conflict in the middle east when half of the EU supports the genocide

    20. MediumMachineGun on

      Yeah nah, keep your empire building dreama to yourself.

    23. Breifne21 on

      Correct me if I’m wrong but isn’t this just a collection of federalist groups doing exactly what they always do and advocate for a federal EU?

    24. RevengerWizard on

      Maybe a confederation of European states would fit better?

    25. Tanckers on

      European union or european federation, i will never consider united states of europe as a viable name and its a hill im dying on

    26. Fragrant-Reserve4832 on

      Does anyone else remember this idea being branded as ridiculous and never going to happen during brexit.

    28. Artistic-Dirt-3199 on

      Oh great even more power into the hands of bureaucrats from ivory towers, more regulations, bans and bullshits.

      How about no.

    29. EatsAlotOfBread on

      No thanks. It just makes it easier for one government to ruin the entire thing instead of just one country.

    Leave A Reply