Il candidato riformista che ha contestato la sconfitta elettorale utilizzando casi di intelligenza artificiale è stato colpito da una fattura di 19.000 sterline
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/reform-liz-williams-worcestershire-election-draw-b2849080.html
di birdinthebush74
5 commenti
Oh look turns out they are flirting with election denial now too.
> He said the legal authorities – previous court decisions used by lawyers to back their cases – appeared to be AI-generated, and said he would not be criticising her.
Seems harsh to ~~fine~~ her £19,000 but if that’s the costs she’s responsible for then that’s the risk.
>a ruling which Mrs Williams said left her feeling “oppressed and silenced”
Oppressed and silenced? Said by the person who was then free (ie: not oppressed) to use the legal system to make a challenge (ie: not silenced).
This morning, someone didn’t fill the coffee machine, which left me oppressed and silenced too….FFS
ChatGpt: “Oh, yes, the judge is absolutely right, let me try again”
*> In Blyth in 2007, the winner in one ward was chosen by the drawing of straws, while a candidate in Yorkshire in 2022 offered to play poker to decide the winner, before going on to draw straws too.*
This was by far the best paragraph of the article