“Lascia o sarai licenziato”: la rabbia come rapporto mette in luce i fallimenti dell’ospedale dopo la sospensione del chirurgo

I’m struggling to marry this statement in the article referring to a report in 2016.

“The independent report states: “Nothing substantial was done by the trust to address any of Ms Stohr’s clinical practice shortcomings.”

It highlights how failures to act on 2016’s findings “resulted in prolonged risk to patients”.

With the quote following a new report addressing the same concerns.

“”The report makes 23 recommendations, which trust chief executive Roland Sinker said would be addressed.

“We are deeply sorry for the impact this incident has had on our patients and their families,” he added.

“This should not have happened, and we are committed to making changes so it does not happen again””

What were Mr Sinker or the hospital board members doing for almost 10 years other than allowing Kuldeep Stohr to continue operating on patients?