La BBC accusata di aver modificato selettivamente la clip di Trump del giorno dell’attacco al Campidoglio | BBC
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2025/nov/03/bbc-accused-selectively-editing-trump-clip-capitol-attack
di DarkSkiesGreyWaters
La BBC accusata di aver modificato selettivamente la clip di Trump del giorno dell’attacco al Campidoglio | BBC
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2025/nov/03/bbc-accused-selectively-editing-trump-clip-capitol-attack
di DarkSkiesGreyWaters
10 commenti
I think we know what’s going to happen now, who will now take channel 1. GB News?
This is really concerning if true.
I really don’t care what people think of him, but the job of the BBC is to be completely impartial at a minimum.
The BBC aim to displease the left and right with equal measure. Personally I very much dislike that editorial slant.
The issue with taking Trump completely in context is that his talks are incoherent and long-winded. You really have to pan for context whenever he moves his cunt mouth.
Bit brazen of the BBC, seems obvious that people (politics junkies) would notice.
“The BBC has been accused of selectively editing a Donald Trump speech to make it appear clearer that he encouraged the US Capitol attack, according to a former external adviser to the corporation.”
“We fight. We fight like hell. And if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.”
Not very hard to make it clearer when he said shit like this, like congrats he said “peacefully and patriotically” once whilst also saying “fight” 20 times
The two clips were 60 minutes apart but they made it look like it was right after each other
Here’s the clip: https://youtu.be/yB-J5-cTJH4?t=150
Oh well. I suppose that means January 6th never happened. Along with all of the other things he’s done over the years.
Selectively editing a Trump clip is serious news.
The Telegraph article also seems to be a tad misleading.
The two specific bits they spliced together, making it look liek “We will walk down to the Capitol” and “we fight like hell” are indeed almost an hour apart. But what they don’t mention is that the the “we fight like hell” comes from the following passage
>And we fight. We fight like hell. And if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.
>Our exciting adventures and boldest endeavors have not yet begun. My fellow Americans, for our movement, for our children, and for our beloved country.
>And I say this despite all that’s happened. The best is yet to come.
>So we’re going to, we’re going to walk down Pennsylvania Avenue. I love Pennsylvania Avenue. And we’re going to the Capitol, and we’re going to try and give.
So it’s not as if the “fight like hell” and the walk to the Capitol were part of two entirely different topics. He’s still linking the two things – walking there and fighting.
You can certainly argue that “fight like hell” is meant to be a metaphoric fight rather than the actual one that happened. But that’s just as true with the Beeb’s original edit.
Editing like this is wrong, and they shouldn’t have done it. But equally the Telegraph shouldn’t go around pretending that the Beeb had created a false link between the two statements. It’s still there, just delivered with slightly different words to the ones in their article.