They don’t want to stop the boats, it’s abundantly clear. The humiliation will continue.
Anxious-Potato-7323 on
I’ve been telling people this. There are other parts of international law that comes into okay. The ECHR is one of several pieces of law when it comes to asylum.
They want your rights gone, not those of migrants.
Farage has just told businesses that he plans to deregulate everything.
It all goes hand in hand. Reform don’t give a fuck about us.
BaBeBaBeBooby on
Wouldn’t leaving the ECHR allow the govt to significantly deter the boats and deal with those arriving differently?
After-Dentist-2480 on
The people who conned us into thinking that leaving the EU would solve all these issues are now trying to con us that leaving the ECHR would do the same.
the_excellent_goat on
Remember guys
~~It’s the EU that is causing your problems~~
It’s your human rights causing your problems
mao_was_right on
It wouldn’t stop any boats, no. The objective is making it actually possible to remove failed asylum seekers and criminals after they arrive without it taking years and failing anyway due to ridiculous Article 8 reasons.
There’s no need to even leave it. Government and Parliament need to clarify how the existing rules should be interpreted to curb abuse of it. It will happen eventually, make no mistake, either here or on the continent, as it is the only way this madness ends.
gofish125 on
Yes technically you have to change the pull factors, but you can’t do that because of the ECHR. Do nothing at your own peril
Clickification on
First they took the EU away from us, they’re coming for the ECHR next. Its all part of a plan to isolate and dismantle our country, take away our rights/freedoms and steal away our wealth and our futures.
Why would they want to solve the ‘immigration problem’ that gets them so much influence and power?
Hint: they don’t.
Source: the Tories ‘anti immigration’ stance leading to the highest immigration levels, ever.
rssurtees on
We have some great human rights lawyers in the UK. We should ask them about the need for the ECHR as we need expert guidance
Seraphidian on
Stop the boats! theyre coming in in record numbers everyday!
“Left wing pro refugee groups say don’t take measure to stop refugees.”
Diligent_Craft_1165 on
ECHR is a red herring. We eventually accept a higher percentage of asylum claims than lots of other European countries. Plenty of countries signed up to the same international treaties as us deport higher numbers.
We need to make it much less attractive for them to come here.
Sonchay on
There hasn’t even been a single appeal case taken up by the ECHR in the last 5 years despite tens of thousands of asylum decisions. This tells us that our institutions are applying an extremely lenient acceptance policy and we should be looking inwards at solving that before considering completely withdrawing from the system.
14 commenti
They don’t want to stop the boats, it’s abundantly clear. The humiliation will continue.
I’ve been telling people this. There are other parts of international law that comes into okay. The ECHR is one of several pieces of law when it comes to asylum.
They want your rights gone, not those of migrants.
Farage has just told businesses that he plans to deregulate everything.
It all goes hand in hand. Reform don’t give a fuck about us.
Wouldn’t leaving the ECHR allow the govt to significantly deter the boats and deal with those arriving differently?
The people who conned us into thinking that leaving the EU would solve all these issues are now trying to con us that leaving the ECHR would do the same.
Remember guys
~~It’s the EU that is causing your problems~~
It’s your human rights causing your problems
It wouldn’t stop any boats, no. The objective is making it actually possible to remove failed asylum seekers and criminals after they arrive without it taking years and failing anyway due to ridiculous Article 8 reasons.
There’s no need to even leave it. Government and Parliament need to clarify how the existing rules should be interpreted to curb abuse of it. It will happen eventually, make no mistake, either here or on the continent, as it is the only way this madness ends.
Yes technically you have to change the pull factors, but you can’t do that because of the ECHR. Do nothing at your own peril
First they took the EU away from us, they’re coming for the ECHR next. Its all part of a plan to isolate and dismantle our country, take away our rights/freedoms and steal away our wealth and our futures.
Why would they want to solve the ‘immigration problem’ that gets them so much influence and power?
Hint: they don’t.
Source: the Tories ‘anti immigration’ stance leading to the highest immigration levels, ever.
We have some great human rights lawyers in the UK. We should ask them about the need for the ECHR as we need expert guidance
Stop the boats! theyre coming in in record numbers everyday!
Oh wait
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/migrants-detected-crossing-the-english-channel-in-small-boats/migrants-detected-crossing-the-english-channel-in-small-boats-last-7-days
Yeah, but leaving will make Keir feel like a [hard bastard](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckg5dgr4mepo) and that’s important to him.
“Left wing pro refugee groups say don’t take measure to stop refugees.”
ECHR is a red herring. We eventually accept a higher percentage of asylum claims than lots of other European countries. Plenty of countries signed up to the same international treaties as us deport higher numbers.
We need to make it much less attractive for them to come here.
There hasn’t even been a single appeal case taken up by the ECHR in the last 5 years despite tens of thousands of asylum decisions. This tells us that our institutions are applying an extremely lenient acceptance policy and we should be looking inwards at solving that before considering completely withdrawing from the system.