In case anyone wonders who benefits from the BBC getting a bad rap
Marcuse0 on
Perhaps he should sue the Daily Mail for $1bn and see how that goes.
Gentle_Snail on
People may criticise the BBC but there is a reason why its attackers had to go back over a year to find one example, while I could just open any edition of the Daily Mail and find dozens.
Fire_Otter on
ok fairs fair, the editor in chief of the Daily Mail needs to resign
and the BBC gets to spend the next week consistently shitting on the daily mail
Gentle_Snail on
They didn’t even misquote him, they just made up their own fucking line
>The story quoted him saying there was a ‘fear of making decisions and a fear of the truth’ in response to Donald Trump’s wrath.
>
>However, it has since transpired that Robinson wasn’t just misquoted – but that he had never made a comment even remotely like that. The fabricated quote was allowed to remain unchallenged for 72 hours
Alive_kiwi_7001 on
Ah, the Daily Mail going after famous lefties like *checks notes* Nick Robinson.
Nothing like a spot of blue-on-blue.
OneNormalBloke on
Imagine DailyFail apologising. It must really hurt them and serves them right.
ionetic on
Is this a criminal offence under the Online Safety Act?
jenny_905 on
Shitrag still collects hundreds of upvotes every time it is spammed here.
MermaidPigeon on
I love how the BBC realised a advert about “honesty in reporting” just before the court case was announced
After-Dentist-2480 on
I presume the Daily Mail editor and the journalist responsible for the fabrication will be resigning.
That’s how the Mail views such shenanigans in the media, isn’t it?
Psychological-Ad1264 on
There is absolutely no way that rag will ever have to meet the standards it expects of others.
They are scum.
mattcannon2 on
I expect to see the editors resignation in tomorrows paper.
13 commenti
In case anyone wonders who benefits from the BBC getting a bad rap
Perhaps he should sue the Daily Mail for $1bn and see how that goes.
People may criticise the BBC but there is a reason why its attackers had to go back over a year to find one example, while I could just open any edition of the Daily Mail and find dozens.
ok fairs fair, the editor in chief of the Daily Mail needs to resign
and the BBC gets to spend the next week consistently shitting on the daily mail
They didn’t even misquote him, they just made up their own fucking line
>The story quoted him saying there was a ‘fear of making decisions and a fear of the truth’ in response to Donald Trump’s wrath.
>
>However, it has since transpired that Robinson wasn’t just misquoted – but that he had never made a comment even remotely like that. The fabricated quote was allowed to remain unchallenged for 72 hours
Ah, the Daily Mail going after famous lefties like *checks notes* Nick Robinson.
Nothing like a spot of blue-on-blue.
Imagine DailyFail apologising. It must really hurt them and serves them right.
Is this a criminal offence under the Online Safety Act?
Shitrag still collects hundreds of upvotes every time it is spammed here.
I love how the BBC realised a advert about “honesty in reporting” just before the court case was announced
I presume the Daily Mail editor and the journalist responsible for the fabrication will be resigning.
That’s how the Mail views such shenanigans in the media, isn’t it?
There is absolutely no way that rag will ever have to meet the standards it expects of others.
They are scum.
I expect to see the editors resignation in tomorrows paper.