*In accordance with Article 11(1) and (2) of the Treaty on European Union*
*(TEU), the institutions must, by appropriate means, give citizens and*
*representative associations the opportunity to make known and publicly*
*exchange their views in all areas of Union action and are required to*
*maintain an open, transparent and regular dialogue with representative*
*associations and civil society. Furthermore, in accordance with*
*Article 2 of Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of*
*subsidiarity and proportionality, and with Article 11(3) of the TEU, the*
*Commission has to consult widely before proposing legislative acts.*
[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32024D3081](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32024D3081)
On the other hand:
*The protection of natural persons in relation to the processing of*
*personal data is a fundamental right. Article 8(1) of the Charter of*
*Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the ‘Charter’) and Article*
*16(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)*
*provide that everyone has the right to the protection of personal data*
*concerning him or her.*
[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj/eng](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj/eng)
And UHDR, esp. article 12
loginisverybroken on
This seems like a great idea that won’t have any blow back whatsoever
/s
cohana1215 on
Mom, I want China. -We got china at home.
China at home:
Judge_T on
This website looks sus as hell, the pic looks like anti-EU propaganda, and this user’s entire post history is about the EU and Chat Control.
We seem to be having an influx of Russian bots riding on this topic. I oppose Chat Control like everyone else here, but be aware of that.
EmbarrassedHelp on
The vote tomorrow is for Committee of Permanent Representatives, or Coreper, a club of national ambassadors whose job is to prepare legislation for the European Council.
Patrick Breyer said this on his Mastodon account:
> 🇪🇺EU government ambassadors set to adopt #ChatControl negotiating mandate tomorrow without discussion, including “voluntary” mass scanning and anonymity-destroying age verification.
It sounds like the legislation is otherwise on hold until 2026, but that doesn’t mean we should let up.
Immediate_Rhubarb430 on
The level of disinfo being carried out by anti-chat control advocates makes me wary. The EU is _NOT_ planning to pass chat control tomorrow.
However, this is as good a chance as any to remind people of the dramatic opaqueness of the EU council and trilateral dialogues between the council, the parliament, and the commission
A questionable source exhibits *one or more* of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing of credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news.
**Overall, we rate Disclose TV Right Biased and questionable based on the use of poor sources, a lack of transparency, failed fact checks, and though improved, a long history of promoting conspiracy theories and pseudoscience.**
I vehemently oppose Chat Control, but this post is fake news.
Looks like we have Russian bots pushing this topic, enjoying the growing distrust towards the EU.
If you would understand the legislative process of the EU, you’d know that any policy must pass through the EU council (all our governments) and then through the EU parliament (all elected MEPs).
Currently, the majority is opposing the Chat Control.
12 commenti
Contact your representatives on https://fightchatcontrol.eu/
And tell that this legislation is unacceptable.
Spend less time online.
On the one hand:
*In accordance with Article 11(1) and (2) of the Treaty on European Union*
*(TEU), the institutions must, by appropriate means, give citizens and*
*representative associations the opportunity to make known and publicly*
*exchange their views in all areas of Union action and are required to*
*maintain an open, transparent and regular dialogue with representative*
*associations and civil society. Furthermore, in accordance with*
*Article 2 of Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of*
*subsidiarity and proportionality, and with Article 11(3) of the TEU, the*
*Commission has to consult widely before proposing legislative acts.*
[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32024D3081](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32024D3081)
On the other hand:
*The protection of natural persons in relation to the processing of*
*personal data is a fundamental right. Article 8(1) of the Charter of*
*Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the ‘Charter’) and Article*
*16(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)*
*provide that everyone has the right to the protection of personal data*
*concerning him or her.*
[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj/eng](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj/eng)
And UHDR, esp. article 12
This seems like a great idea that won’t have any blow back whatsoever
/s
Mom, I want China. -We got china at home.
China at home:
This website looks sus as hell, the pic looks like anti-EU propaganda, and this user’s entire post history is about the EU and Chat Control.
We seem to be having an influx of Russian bots riding on this topic. I oppose Chat Control like everyone else here, but be aware of that.
The vote tomorrow is for Committee of Permanent Representatives, or Coreper, a club of national ambassadors whose job is to prepare legislation for the European Council.
Patrick Breyer said this on his Mastodon account:
> 🇪🇺EU government ambassadors set to adopt #ChatControl negotiating mandate tomorrow without discussion, including “voluntary” mass scanning and anonymity-destroying age verification.
> The protest continues next year! https://chatcontrol.eu 💪
https://digitalcourage.social/@echo_pbreyer
It sounds like the legislation is otherwise on hold until 2026, but that doesn’t mean we should let up.
The level of disinfo being carried out by anti-chat control advocates makes me wary. The EU is _NOT_ planning to pass chat control tomorrow.
However, this is as good a chance as any to remind people of the dramatic opaqueness of the EU council and trilateral dialogues between the council, the parliament, and the commission
[https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/disclose-tv/](https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/disclose-tv/)
# QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits *one or more* of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing of credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news.
**Overall, we rate Disclose TV Right Biased and questionable based on the use of poor sources, a lack of transparency, failed fact checks, and though improved, a long history of promoting conspiracy theories and pseudoscience.**
Questionable Reasoning: **Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency, Failed Fact Checks, Conspiracy, Pseudoscience**
Bias Rating: **RIGHT**
Factual Reporting: **MIXED**
Country: **Germany**
Press Freedom Rank: **MOSTLY FREE**
Media Type: **Website**
Traffic/Popularity: **High Traffic (via social media)**
MBFC Credibility Rating: **LOW CREDIBILITY**
[ Removed by Reddit ]
I vehemently oppose Chat Control, but this post is fake news.
Looks like we have Russian bots pushing this topic, enjoying the growing distrust towards the EU.
If you would understand the legislative process of the EU, you’d know that any policy must pass through the EU council (all our governments) and then through the EU parliament (all elected MEPs).
Currently, the majority is opposing the Chat Control.
“disclose.tv”
Wake up people