Stavo studiando per la mia patente di guida e mi sono imbattuto in questa domanda. Non sono madrelingua, ma le risposte B e C non sono la stessa cosa?”
https://i.redd.it/khr9yh4h0k0d1.png
di Enough-Possibility-7
Stavo studiando per la mia patente di guida e mi sono imbattuto in questa domanda. Non sono madrelingua, ma le risposte B e C non sono la stessa cosa?”
https://i.redd.it/khr9yh4h0k0d1.png
di Enough-Possibility-7
15 commenti
Not necessarily. The nuance here is that statement C is a more defensive posture than B, which will always be the preferred option when driving.
B is “I keep my speed constant” and C is “I don’t accelerate and slow down when necesary” which is not the same thing as keeping a constant speed (your speed isn’t constant if you slow down).
Terrible question, it needs to specify current speed, speed limit, etc to be able to make this judgement.
Physics say that if you don’t accelerate, you’ll slowly decelerate over time.
Physics also say that your speed stays the same if you keep your speed the same.
Used google lens to translate.
B seems to say “I keep my speed constant”. What if you have 80 km/h? Do you still keep the same speed?
When you can misinterpret an answer, it is the wrong one. Like..what constant speed 20, 40, 140?
Theorie: niet versnellen omdat je wordt ingehaald
Realiteit: snelheid constant houden om die sukkelaar opt linker rijvak in te halen
If you don’t give gas, you’ll slow down
That’s the Bisschoppenhoflaan. The only correct answer would be
D. Make a u-turn and drive back towards the light
Ah das dien Bisschoppenhoflaan geloof me veel accidenten gebeuren hier op den straat
c is the correct answer, but I think their “ik geef geen extra gas” should actually be “Ik laat de gaspedaal los” as other people have pointed out there’s only limited view on the situation.
I had this one on my motorcycle exam but it was slightly different with a branch on the street. Answer was C but I made a mistake because of the branch and answered A. 😔
I am a native speaker, and I think this is a thoroughly stupid question. On closer inspection, yes, there’s nuance between B and C. But to have such an unclear question appear on a test is rather stupid. Tests like these need to have clear cut, easy to understand questions to truly test if the person taking the test understands traffic laws. Not doing so is shooting yourself in the foot by diluting the results and failing people unnecessarily. Traffic is al about being predictable after all, isn’t it? So why make a confusing question?
These driving exams frequently present options that are quite similar. It is essential to identify the response that most accurately addresses the question. Although it may only be a single word difference, this can be sufficient to render the answer incorrect.
Poorly worded, maybe on purpose
Note that 2 blue-white signs overhead and markings o. the road that you’re nearing a crosswalk, where one end is obscured from your view by parked cars.
Hence, you have to be ready to brake if a pedestrian happens to be there and wants to cross instead of just maintaining speed.