Donald Trump intenta una causa da 10 miliardi di dollari contro la BBC Il presidente americano sostiene che il documentario del 2024 dell’emittente pubblica britannica era “denigratorio, provocatorio e dannoso”

https://www.ft.com/content/e2f19150-5f64-4ba8-9d62-4a7c3ee49e73

di BkkGrl

Share.

37 commenti

  1. > Donald Trump is suing the BBC for $10bn over a misleading edit of a speech by the US president in a documentary, which he alleges was “fabricated” and defamatory.
    >
    > The lawsuit, filed on Monday, accuses the UK public broadcaster of publishing “a false, defamatory, deceptive, disparaging, inflammatory and malicious depiction of President Trump” in a Panorama documentary that aired ahead of the 2024 US presidential election.
    >
    > The BBC apologised to Trump last month over the documentary, which suggested he had encouraged his supporters to storm the Capitol building on January 6 2021 as lawmakers ratified his loss to Joe Biden in the 2020 US election.
    >
    > Trump brought the lawsuit in his personal capacity in a federal court in Florida, suing the BBC for one count of defamation and one count of violating Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. The president is seeking at least $5bn in damages for each count.
    >
    > The court documents said that the documentary had caused “massive economic damage to his brand value and significant damage and injury to his future financial prospects”.
    >
    > The BBC said on Tuesday: “As we have made clear previously, we will be defending this case. We are not going to make further comment on ongoing legal proceedings.”
    >
    > Last month, the broadcaster said that while it “sincerely regrets the manner in which the video clip was edited, we strongly disagree there is a basis for a defamation claim”.
    >
    > The lawsuit raises the stakes in the UK broadcaster’s clash with Trump, which has led to the resignations of BBC director-general Tim Davie and the head of BBC News Deborah Turness.
    >
    > It also marks the latest complaint filed by the president against a media outlet. He has targeted US groups including CBS over its editing of an interview with Kamala Harris, his Democratic rival in the 2024 election race.
    >
    > Trump also sued ABC for defamation over on-air comments made by George Stephanopoulos, one of its star anchors. CBS owner Paramount and ABC have agreed to pay $16mn and $15mn respectively to settle the president’s lawsuits.
    >
    > The BBC lawsuit centres on the documentary splicing together parts of Trump’s speech in which he told supporters on January 6 2021 to “walk down to the Capitol” and then to “fight like hell”.
    >
    > Trump had originally said “we’re going to walk down to the Capitol and cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women”.
    >
    > The president, in Monday’s filing, alleged that the BBC had “intentionally omitted” a part of the speech in which he said: “I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.”
    >
    > Legal experts have said that the case’s success is likely to initially hinge on whether Trump’s lawyers could prove jurisdiction to pursue the case in a Florida court.
    >
    > The lawsuit can be filed in Florida because the BBC dispatched staff there to gather original footage for the documentary, Trump claims, making the BBC “subject to personal jurisdiction”.
    >
    > Trump’s lawsuit also states that the show was available in Florida to subscribers of BritBox, the BBC-owned subscription streaming service. It argues that viewers may have used VPNs to circumvent “geoblocking” restrictions on the broadcast, and claims that it was distributed through a third-party distributor called Blue Ant Media Corporation.
    >
    > Blue Ant Media oversees international licensing of the documentary outside the UK, which means it had the rights to sell it to international broadcasters. The company, which last month said that the show had been withdrawn from its distribution catalogue, was not immediately available for comment on Tuesday.
    >
    > BBC lawyers last month set out five grounds to reject Trump’s defamation claim, according to people with knowledge of the position, including arguing that there was no jurisdiction. The BBC said that the documentary was not distributed in the US and the broadcaster’s iPlayer streaming service was “geoblocked” from viewers.
    >
    > British politicians rallied around the BBC on Tuesday. Stephen Kinnock, a minister in the Labour government, said that “it’s right that the BBC stands firm” and that “they are right to stick by their guns”. He said Labour “will always stand up for the BBC as a vitally important institution”.
    >
    > He told Sky News that the BBC has been “very clear that there is no case to answer in terms of Mr Trump’s accusations on the broader point about libel or defamation”.
    >
    > Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said that the government needed to “stand up for the BBC against Trump’s outrageous legal threat and protect licence fee payers from being hit in the pocket”.
    >
    > The lawsuit threatens to overshadow the UK government’s publication of a green paper later on Tuesday that will lay out options for the future of the BBC, including funding options.
    >

  2. Electrical-Brain-989 on

    Lol, classic Trump move. Suing BBC, rly? Dude’s got more $$$ than sense.

  3. araujoms on

    That’s what you get for bending over for Trump. Fucking morons.

  4. Millefeuille-coil on

    Let’s start a petition for compulsory purchase of all his assets in the UK

  5. They’ve ruined my reputation says the rapist, likely peadophile and twice impeached president.

  6. NocturneFogg on

    The lawsuit also seems legally impossible. The item was never broadcast by the BBC in the US in the first place, so he’s literally attempting to sue a British public corporation, in Florida for content it broadcast in the UK.

    Even if he successfully won a case like that in the English High Court where jurisdiction would be a lot more reasonable, the payout would be nothing like that.

    If he won the case in Florida, I don’t even see how it would be enforceable against the BBC. The companies trading as BBC America aren’t owned by BBC – just licensees of the brand.

    I mean, they could attempt to enforce a Florida judgments payout in the UK through the English high court, but it would quite likely be thrown out and then what? Some political blow up with the British government ?!

  7. People are going to be negative simply because its Trump but he is kinda right in this case.

    I watched an analysis from The Telegraph regarding the BBC documentary and that was pure manipulation from the editors. Really disappointed in BBC…

    https://youtu.be/EjPlfUt4S9U?si=vmYKe7V4BpfMWOhj

    Keep downvoting me because I did more than just read headlines and write angry comments. Never change Reddit…

  8. Equivalent-Role4632 on

    All the people he insults should be suing him for 10 billion each. Quiet piggy and all that. Sue his ass.

  9. Fabulous_Outcome8622 on

    All while he mocks a murder, he thinks he has grounds of being defamed. He is the piece of shite all of the world can see.

  10. Euphoric-Badger-873 on

    I heard Glasgow City Council were thinking of suing Trump just because he’s a Fanny!

  11. Sounds like we need a sequel then. Heading to go watch the first one.

  12. HatIntelligent6028 on

    He wants to attack any broadcaster that is not a fascist mouthpiece

  13. TheHearseDriver on

    BBC, DO NOT FOLD!!! Too many companies and individuals keep „settling“ with Trump. FIGHT BACK!

  14. 1_Upminster on

    Some people are unable to see the truth about themselves, and given their inherent insecurities, they project their flaws on others. Who is it who is actually disparaging, inflammatory, and malicious ??

  15. greenscout33 on

    I can’t speak to whether he’ll win the case (since it was a UK broadcast and the lawsuit is in Florida), but it is hard to escape the conclusion that it was indeed “disparaging/ inflammatory/ malicious”.

    When the man gives you all the ammunition you could ever need to attack him, and you still decide to cut footage together to confect an imaginary narrative, you are irresponsible and you are not a journalist.

    The BBC is repeatedly making the worst case for itself, between its Middle-Eastern-Language pages promoting unchecked islamist propaganda, to outright libel of the President of the US (regardless of his character), there really is a case to be made for significant intervention in the way the BBC operates.

    I don’t think he’ll win the suit, I don’t like the man himself, but I think he is right.

  16. Basic-Still-7441 on

    Grifter is going to grift until put to jail. He’s going to continue grifting there but the good thing there is that he will be grifting other criminals like himself. Good riddance!

  17. chanjitsu on

    They could probably settle by awarding him the “BBC Peace Prize”

  18. ChoosenUserName4 on

    Can you Americans please put grandpa to bed? This is bordering on elderly abuse. He’s obviously very confused and lost.

  19. ilovebeetrootalot on

    Lol South Park was pretty spot on with their portrayal of Trump

  20. equality4all1701 on

    How about everyone and every nation trump disparaged sue him for his inflammatory comments?

  21. JoshyaJade01 on

    Wonder when people are going to sue HIM for remarks he makes. 🤷

  22. Lynch8933 on

    Its what he has been doing for year, just trying to shake them down so they settle and he walks away with a couple of million

  23. TheSoupThief on

    The problem is that if the BBC fight this (which they absolutely would be right to do – it was an error for which they issued an apology) the cost of doing so and winning is thought likely to be greater than the cost of settling. So they’d need to gamble on the chance of being awarded costs. That’s a hell of a gamble at a time when they have so much else ongoing, with charter renewal etc.

    I’d throw a tenner at a GoFundMe for a legal fund for the Beeb to help them beat this – wonder if enough would?

  24. lala-ada-dimana-mana on

    The land of free !! Free to sue if you don’t like others to use their FREE SPEECH!!

  25. Ballistic-Bob on

    It was never shown out side Uk .. also No one in America including Trump even knew about it until a few months ago … and 10 billion? For a reputation that is self tarnished anyway… raper , abuser , liar adulterer , bankrupt,tax evader , fraudster , narcissist and child sex trafficker ( possibly a nonce too ) … there is still not one decent quality that man possesses.

Leave A Reply