Share.

22 commenti

  1. Cornflake0305 on

    I mean, alright.

    I get that the USA aren’t a very trustworthy partner right now. But choosing between F-35 and the Gripen is like choosing between a brand new Ferrari and your mom’s Renault Twingo.

  2. tree_boom on

    Fortunately military procurement is not based public opinion

  3. Hmansink on

    Im not even sure those Gripens have enough range to cover Canada completely

  4. SunflowerSync on

    Not really surprised by this. The F-35 has been controversial in Canada for years because of cost overruns and delays, while the Gripen is seen as cheaper, easier to maintain, and better suited for Canada’s needs. Public opinion seems to reflect fatigue with the F-35 saga more than deep loyalty to any specific jet.

  5. 50s_Human on

    We should just be buying from allies. Gripen will look great in RCAF livery.

  6. toorigged2fail on

    While increasingly fleeting, there are times it seems beneficial to being a representative rather than direct democracy

  7. 22stanmanplanjam11 on

    Canada just needs to make literally any choice at all on fighter jets as long as they actually make it. This has been going on since 2014 they keep cancelling the procurement and then doing new trials that discover everything they already knew.

    They could have picked the F-35, Gripen, Rafale, or Eurofighter Typhoon and regardless of which one they picked their air force would be in a substantially better position than it is today.

  8. Intreductor on

    F-35 – You can’t see me on your radar.

    Gripen – You can see me on your radar, all 8 of me.

  9. Meanwhile, Denmark is ordering new F-35 planes from the very country that threatens to take Greenland by force.

  10. PwntUpRage on

    Let’s face it, Canada isn’t going to go on the offensive with anyone. We can buy twice as many f35’s and we wouldn’t be able to stop a Russian invasion over the pole.
    So why not buy a not as good fighter but still a workable one that also creates lots of jobs in Canada?
    If the gripen is a total peice of trash then don’t do it. But if it’s decent then that’s fine.

  11. FitSyrup2403 on

    Grippen are great. They can start and Land on shitty roads, easy and fast to equip with new ammo and relatively cheap. And my favorite part: Everyone can develop upgrades

    On the other hand you have the f35:
    They are expensive as shit, expensive to maintain Nobody exept Us and the US favorite country have Access to the rootsystem… you cannot use the planes without the military services that are strictly only located in the US and its favorite country,
    else you cannot really rely on them if you want to do anything that are against the builders interest because them planes have a kill switch and you have to buy the Us overpriced weapons system

    In summery you just have a really expansive piece of junk

  12. Brunsosse on

    Maybe the ridicilious study that found f-35 to be ”easier”(?) to maintain was one of the reasons 😄

  13. Eljefeesmuerto on

    Canadian sentiment is for the Gripen vs the exhaustive study that found the f-35 won by a landslide. Politics be politicking.

  14. Constant-Theory-154 on

    Sweden is stable and reliable. It is democratic in more than just words. The US is like a coin: it will fall as it falls.

  15. Iwannafucktanks on

    Most Canadians are idiots who don’t know jack shit about military procurement and our air force capabilities.

  16. heatrealist on

    All the F-35 experts on reddit used to be COVID experts before 😉

  17. TheoryOfDevolution on

    Your average Canadian doesn’t know a thing about how the RCAF works or why it overwhelmingly prefers the F-35. Ask the average Canadian on the street about where they thing the CAF’s biggest overseas deployment is and few of them would know that it’s in Estonia. Military procurement should be left to the experts, not the whimsical demands of the mass acting on emotion.

    I’ll just re-post what I posted before about the viability of the Gripen for Canada, that it hinges on a bunch of copiums like:

    1) Ukraine, a war-torn and impoverished nation, somehow finding dozens of billions to buy 150 Gripens.

    2) That Canada can afford a mixed fleet despite being barely able to afford its 4,000 troops stationed in Estonia or even housing them in Canada.

    3) That Saab can actually deliver 10,000 jobs for local assembly of a fighter made up of mostly foreign parts.

    4) That the Gripen can be retooled to use an engine that has never existed and was designed and conceptualized in the 90s for a entirely different plane.

    5) That Canada can build out an assembly line quickly enough and somehow pump out enough planes to replace its aging CF-18s in the next 10 years. This is despite the fact that Brazil, which also has local assembly of Gripens, [won’t complete its order of 15 Gripen E/F until 2032](https://aerospaceglobalnews.com/news/brazil-used-gripen-sweden-fighter-gap/), a full 18 years afters it initial order in 2014.

    6) On top of that, the Gripen will somehow be competitive with current 5th gen fighters and even emerging 6th fighters 10 years from now.

    7) And lastly, that the US would allow critical parts like the GE F414 or the Collins avionics to be exported to Canada for Gripen assembly or that it won’t block the Gripen from NORAD certification.

  18. sojuz151 on

    If you want to use your warplanes  for war then F-35 is the far superior choice.  If you want to have a fighter force to deal with a commercial jet that in not answering then something like FA-50 will be a better choice. I am not sure what do they want those Gripens for. 

  19. SippsMccree on

    I dont think this is a subject that the lawmakers are too worried about what the public thinks. I can still see them buying the F-35 because we have more production capacity and most or all parts will be a border away and not an ocean away. Don’t matter how much you all love or hate Trump he’s only here until 2028 despite what the Qanon level conspiracy theorists are claiming

  20. TianZiGaming on

    With how awful Canadian military procurement has been, it comes as no surprise that they’re polling the general public for their opinion.

Leave A Reply