Close Menu
    Europa

    Il tasso di fertilità della Polonia scende al minimo storico, con 90 distretti al di sotto di 1,0

    Share.
    View 16 Comments

    16 commenti

    3. Clear_Doughnut3475 on

      Poland isn’t exactly a great place to raise a family

    5. QuotableMorceau on

      kind of odd, considering church adherence is pretty high there, so I guess there is a winner between the two messages pushed by the church :
      “make more babies !!!!1111oneoneone”
      “no babies out of wedlock!!!!1111oneone”

    6. Ingolin on

      If Poland is as conservative as I’ve heard, this makes sense. Modern women don’t want to get trapped in a traditional marriage. So they don’t have kids.

    7. Assic on

      It was slowly going down. But our politicians outrun themselves in screwing the population over during COVID and introduced very harsh laws against grouping in public spaces. So people stopped interacing in public.

    8. Sonnet__ on

      Yet another thread about demography, in which 100 different people will try to explain how their idea is actually going to solve the problem and make birthrate go up (idea has been tried billion times in million countries, doesn’t work).

    10. naakka on

      This is not specifically related to Poland, but I just wonder if there actually are any countries/regions/demographic groups where people are having more than 2.1 children per woman AND have good access to contraception and good equality between the sexes (where women can choose to not become a mother without heavy pressure from others)?

      And if yes, what are the actual factors that correlate with people wanting 2+ kids?

      Is the “problem” actually that a lot of people don’t really want 2+ kids (under realistic circumstances, not “if you were a millionaire and didn’t have to work) if they are truly free to choose? There are a fairly big percentage of people who want 0 kids and some who cannot have any, so in practice you would need quite a lot of people having 3 or more kids to achieve 2.1 on average. Assuming we don’t want people who want 0 children to have children anyway.

    11. 73Rose on

      Its because living is unaffordable for young people -that’s it

      check out what average rent is, around 3000-4500 while pay is around 4500 without a tertiary degreee -INSANITY

    13. JLaws23 on

      I think a world with less people in it would be great. Wasn’t overpopulation a problem? There were about 50 million people in the U.K. in the 80s and now there’s 70 million. When was the quality of life better?

    14. Prudent-Bicycle-9210 on

      We need more funding for miners, farmers and the elderly then. This is the only way to fix the issue!

    15. PabloZissou on

      I am surprised how this articles pop up every 2 days. It’s simple: people can’t predict if they will have a job in 3 months and everything becomes more expensive every three months, companies close constantly…what sane person would think “this is a great time to start a family”.

    16. Cicada-4A on

      It turns out that encouraging women to work professional lives has a hugely deleterious effect on their behavioral ability to reproduce, *who would’ve thought.*

    Leave A Reply