Close Menu
    Regno Unito

    Quasi 70 comuni inglesi affermano di essere a rischio di insolvenza a causa del debito legato all’istruzione per bisogni speciali

    Share.
    View 16 Comments

    16 commenti

    1. Codydoc4 on

      > As a result of such pressures, councils have been overspending their special needs budgets, with deficits rising from £200mn in 2020-21 to £2.5bn this financial year. Since 2020 ministers have used an emergency measure known as a statutory override to allow councils to ignore these overspends in their budgets.

      Jesus, at this stage just bring SEND and elderly care under central government bung them both into DWP, this is why local govt can’t actually do anything meaningful.

    2. wkavinsky on

      Slight correction – it’s all the statutory requirements the Tories spent 14 years shovelling off onto local councils so they could claim “austerity is working”, and that, somewhat shockingly, Labour don’t even appear to be looking at bringing back into central funding.

    3. Legitimate_Eye8494 on

      And they claim this while the special needs education is busy tripping over it’s own feet and failing to provide even basic educational needs.

    4. Slapped91 on

      Yeah because every slight problem results in a “Special Needs” label these days.

      When I was at a school a swiftly administered clip round the ear cured and negated 99% of “special needs” requirements.

    5. klepto_entropoid on

      And if its not that, its social care.

      Meanwhile your Council Tax, a fundamentally flawed joke system literally transcribed on the back of a fag packet by John Major when the British public rioted over a much more progressive and fairer tax they tried to implement, subsequently abandoned.. will just rise and rise exponentially until the Local Council will just seize your assets when you can’t or won’t pay.

      Average age in the UK is now 58% over 40.

      There’s nowhere to go with Council Tax except the poor house.

    6. giblets46 on

      Sure that raising tax on all the private schools will have helped, large number of SeND parents sent their kids there as the had better support, now back in the system, so it’ll only get worse

    7. ablativeyoyo on

      In 1990, less than 2% of pupils had special needs. In 2025 it was nearly 20%. We need to refocus on the most needy.

    8. georgialucy on

      A lot of expensive contracts to private companies. Eye watering amounts are paid for things as simple as taxi services to and from schools when it would make a lot more sense to have our own services. Even care homes and respite for children are privately owned, as soon as you do this you are paying premiums to businesses. It’s happening with the NHS too, it just throwing money away.

    9. Complex_Specific1373 on

      People need to start paying for themselves and their kids.

    10. AstronautAshamed3061 on

      Another example of UK folk wanting great social welfare across the board and maintain (relatively) low taxation.

      It doesn’t stack up and never will.

    11. ohthedarside on

      Yea thats what happens when we refuse to built enough special needs schools

      And when new special needs schools open they are atleast a hour away from any city and in buildings barely usable as a school

    12. likewhatilikeilike on

      Well if they bailed out the banks then surely they could do the same for the councils 🙄

    13. Barto on

      I heard 2nd hand that people are suing the councils to send their kids to private schools with the council footing the bill. If that is happening no wonder the budget is gone.

    14. Astriania on

      This stuff – SEND education and adult social care – needs to be back under the central government pot.

      But also, the big problem with SEND is that every man and his dog claims to be SEND now, so the amount that is “needed” is completely unaffordable, whoever is paying for it. When the amount of kids on a special needs plan or receiving additional support is 50 or 100% higher than it used to be, there are clearly a lot of kids who would actually be fine in a normal educational setting getting extra resources to improve their outcomes.

    15. Consistent-Pirate-23 on

      So many people are saying x and y didn’t happen way back when:

      I was a SEND kid in the late 80s and early 90s. I know exactly what happened.

      There were SEND kids getting taxis to school, often it was because our mums didn’t drive, mine certainly didn’t until years later. I can still remember the struggles each kid in my shared taxi had.

      There were about 3 or so SEND kids per class of 30 and easily as many again that clearly struggled and either got a lot of help from the teacher or just muddled on and didn’t do very well. Dyslexia, adhd etc all ignored, and if you got diagnosed then the stigma you and your parents faced was awful. Again, I can remember most of the ones in both my class and the class below (mostly siblings of kids I knew or that lived near us before we moved)

    16. Intrepidy on

      The only thing preventing the cut-down of SEND budgets is that pip and motability and child benefit caps have all the attention. Give it a little while and it’ll be reformed into something much leaner and specialist.

    Leave A Reply